Only because they didn't hug it out after the play I supposeThis is only half as bad as punching your wife on an elevator I guess!
Only because they didn't hug it out after the play I supposeThis is only half as bad as punching your wife on an elevator I guess!
That punishment is way over the top. This is football! Ya think stepping on a guys foot is the worthy of a suspension? A lot worse goes on
If it was a first time offense, maybe. This is what... like his 4th reprimand? Justified punishment.agree with this. big fine, no suspension.
I wonder who's going to pay this d-bag in free agency. He's a good player but he's just a ****. I don't think he get Gerald McCoy money.
Oh I agree. The suspension is a mixture of Suh's reputation and Aaron Rodgers being on the receiving end IMO. But no question his reputation was a major factor.
To the part I quoted. It does happen to many players in many games, but when it happens to the Big 3 is usually when you will see punishment. I still don't think Suh is suspended if he steps on Teddy B or Jay Cutler. But that's just my opinion.
He's been reprimanded or fine or suspended I think 8 or 9 times.If it was a first time offense, maybe. This is what... like his 4th reprimand? Justified punishment.
If it was a first time offense, maybe. This is what... like his 4th reprimand? Justified punishment.
The whole Detroit team has a problem. Their center Raiola stomped on Chicago DT Ferguson in the Lions last game. Raiola was suspended for one game (yesterday's Packer game).
That punishment is way over the top. This is football! Ya think stepping on a guys foot is the worthy of a suspension? A lot worse goes on
Don't forget that number 12 already had a bum leg and suh knew what he was doing by stepping on it. What is this? Pro wrestling? If he is trying to take him out suspend him the rest of the playoffs
I'll say this first...I'm a Lions fan but not a Suh fan. The problem I have is that there was no definitive "intent". Raiola was clearly intentional...but this was not clear, IMO. To have the NFL call it a "violation of safety-related playing rules" is a joke. You know how many of those happen on a weekly basis? There will be few games on Sunday if this way of reviewing the game is how we go forward.
As much as I hate to say it, Favre was better if for no other reason than he wasn't a constant whiner like Rodgers. Favre would have jumped up and taken a poke at Suh. He was more of a football player and less of a poster-boy.
It's football...**** happens...and you can't make precedent-setting decisions based on someone's reputation, which is what I believe the NFL did. Show me definitive intent in this, sans Suh's rep, and I'll concede. Otherwise, I agree that it was kowtowing to the GB and Rodgers fan base.
I'll say this first...I'm a Lions fan but not a Suh fan. The problem I have is that there was no definitive "intent". Raiola was clearly intentional...but this was not clear, IMO. To have the NFL call it a "violation of safety-related playing rules" is a joke. You know how many of those happen on a weekly basis? There will be few games on Sunday if this way of reviewing the game is how we go forward.
As much as I hate to say it, Favre was better if for no other reason than he wasn't a constant whiner like Rodgers. Favre would have jumped up and taken a poke at Suh. He was more of a football player and less of a poster-boy.
It's football...**** happens...and you can't make precedent-setting decisions based on someone's reputation, which is what I believe the NFL did. Show me definitive intent in this, sans Suh's rep, and I'll concede. Otherwise, I agree that it was kowtowing to the GB and Rodgers fan base.