kind of a misleading title. It was all hypothetical.
We are really degenerate when it comes to thread titles around here.
Ten thousand what? $$$?
![]()
Kilos? Hookers? Chizik coins?
I like the 'use of image' stipend. It at least addresses issue of 'marketing' players without compensation.
Whether arbitrary amount of 5K is 'fair' is obviously up for debate. But you have to start somewhere.
agreed. Even acknowledging it as something of value would be a big step. So far, the NCAA has resisted admitting that.
Agreed, there is value. There is also value in having free marketing of your accomplishments and likeness, especially if you have dreams of going pro in that pursuit.
That $6M is going to hurt ISU's AD budget ($62M) than it will hurt Texas' AD budget ($166M). That's nearly 10% of ISU's budget while only about 3.5% of theirs. And of course ISU could pay less than the big boys but that would be competitive suicide.
That $6M is going to hurt ISU's AD budget ($62M) than it will hurt Texas' AD budget ($166M). That's nearly 10% of ISU's budget while only about 3.5% of theirs. And of course ISU could pay less than the big boys but that would be competitive suicide.