Copy/Paste from the other thread?
If the North does have other offers, maybe we still make the move. The North schools collapse the Big 12. That would serve all of the state of Texas right for F'ing this whole thing up.
Who could guess that the Big XII is too psychologically damaged to stay together and too psychologically damaged to fall apart? Definition of purgatory, IMHO
Very interesting article. The irony is, even if they joined the ACC, they'd have to give up the LHN anyway - the ACC is an equal revenue sharing conference. I don't think the ACC would be willing to accommodate the LHN at the cost of destabilizing their conference.
People say that about ISU as well. I'm hoping ISU will end up in a good (profitable) conference situation when all is said and done with this realignment fiasco.
People may say that, but as with many things, most people don't check their facts. Being a founding memeber of the Conference, imo, gave us all the right to belong, and this includes the time long before the Texas schools came in.
I respect your position...but I doubt the power-players care much about whether or not a school was one of the founding institutions. Not when it comes to dollars...
If UT decides to convert the LHN to some sort of Big12 Net ( call it the Longhorn/Big12 Network), I wonder how things would play out? Would it come down to actual percentage split of air time between the schools with UT still getting a plurality of time? Perhaps something along these lines:
If UT decides to convert the LHN to some sort of Big12 Net ( call it the Longhorn/Big12 Network), I wonder how things would play out? Would it come down to actual percentage split of air time between the schools with UT still getting a plurality of time? Perhaps something along these lines:UT -- 30%Just a contemplation of how LH/B12 airtime could be split with the network money split along those lines as well.
OU -- 25%
OSU -- 15%
MU -- 15%
The remaining 5 -- 25% (5% each)
If UT decides to convert the LHN to some sort of Big12 Net ( call it the Longhorn/Big12 Network), I wonder how things would play out? Would it come down to actual percentage split of air time between the schools with UT still getting a plurality of time? Perhaps something along these lines:UT -- 30%Just a contemplation of how LH/B12 airtime could be split with the network money split along those lines as well.
OU -- 25%
OSU -- 15%
MU -- 15%
The remaining 5 -- 25% (5% each)
Perhaps ESPN would dual track the LHN with a Big12 Net, with the Big12 Net money to be evenly split among the other eight schools. Gotta do something to placate OU, OSU and MU to keep the Big12 alive. If the issue is really the LHN, then a conference network along side the LHN seems to be a good solution. That $300M would have to be split between the two networks in some sort of agreeable fashion.I know this is just your own idea, but even the notion that the Big 12 could ever even conceivably think of a gesture like that makes me hate this conference even more.