USC gets rooked by ref

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,831
24,940
113
NCAA officials are evaluated and graded on every play in a game.

Below is the link on how the process works in the SEC. I know this is similar to other conferences, which you can research at your own leisure.


So if a conference really wants a certain team to win, wouldn’t this be a process to encourage that? Officials need to be evaluated by an uninterested party. Create a national committee to do that (cause the NCAA would **** that up too). Do it like basketball and don’t have conference specific officials.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dirt Boy 2

AllInForISU

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2012
4,623
4,931
113
So if a conference really wants a certain team to win, wouldn’t this be a process to encourage that? Officials need to be evaluated by an uninterested party. Create a national committee to do that (cause the NCAA would **** that up too). Do it like basketball and don’t have conference specific officials.

Do you honestly think conferences are actively encouraging officials to favor certain teams and that has ever leaked out?
 

CascadeClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2009
10,882
13,966
113
Seems like that’s a question for the officials and not a message board poster.

I never said it shouldn’t have been called or that it wasnt a missed call, I just said USC should have never let it get to that.
Any close game there are multiple plays that would change the outcome. Including bad calls. We arent supposed to have bad calls, but they happen, just like dropped passes and missed FGs.

The ISSUE here is, are the conference officials protecting teams (miami, psu) in order to get them into the CFP and reap 10s of millions of addl dollars? THAT is the question.

They certainly have means, motive and opportunity. Its easy to understand why these accusations are being made, and its incumbent on the conferences to visibly demonstrate its false. Otherwise you risk becoming the WWE.
 

Cyhig

Well-Known Member
Nov 29, 2017
3,252
6,801
113
I get really tired of people blowing off referee maleficence all because "Team X didn't do enough to win the game". Should USC not screwed up on their end? Of course. But the refs blowing obvious calls is inexcusable - especially when the call determines the outcome of a game. And us ISU fans have experienced this far too often (and sadly some people would rather blame the team instead of being upset at the ref blowing a call that would have won the game).

The thing you all want to blatantly ignore is if the ref had gotten the call correctly then perhaps the team WOULD have done enough to win the game. No team should have to fight the refs on top of their opponents.
The officiating is as much of an influence as the players. For example, let’s say an official makes a mistake on 5 plays. Those mistakes can directly influence the outcome of the game. Also, let’s say the team had 5 crucial mistakes, and those 5 mistakes directly had an influence on the outcome of the game.

In a close game, any one of those 10 mistakes could be pointed to as to the reason a team lost. It’s easy to simply blame the officials, but there also are just as many mistakes the team made that led to the loss. It’s simply a matter of what people want to focus on
 
  • Like
Reactions: AllInForISU

AllInForISU

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2012
4,623
4,931
113
Any close game there are multiple plays that would change the outcome. Including bad calls. We arent supposed to have bad calls, but they happen, just like dropped passes and missed FGs.

The ISSUE here is, are the conference officials protecting teams (miami, psu) in order to get them into the CFP and reap 10s of millions of addl dollars? THAT is the question.

They certainly have means, motive and opportunity. Its easy to understand why these accusations are being made, and its incumbent on the conferences to visibly demonstrate its false. Otherwise you risk becoming the WWE.

1 of the things that I have found to be true throughout my life, is that the more people that know a “secret” the less likely it is to stay secret.

There were over 200 officials working games in P4 conferences this weekend. That’s a lot of people to keep that big of a secret.

Take the tin foil hat off and realize these are part time officials who make mistakes occasionally.
 

Dirt Boy 2

Well-Known Member
Feb 23, 2013
320
343
63
There certainly were a lot of favorable calls for Iowa State last night.
I agree. It pays to undefeated and potentially rep the conference in the playoffs. You get the”benefit of the doubt.” Reminds me of the Baylor/TCU fiasco 10 years ago. Big 12 tried to make a decision in that game. Conferences have been playing that game for years now. Too much money involved.
 

Rural

Well-Known Member
Feb 3, 2010
43,107
36,348
113
I'm totally surprised a second wasn't put on the clock for Ohio State to attempt a winning field goal.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Peter

3TrueFans

Just a Happily Married Man
Sep 10, 2009
63,245
61,919
113
Ames
This exactly, if they wanted, there would be plenty of justification based on loose interpretation of “when the slide starts “.
It wasn't a first down though so I think it would depend partially on if OSU was trying to call a timeout at the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AllInForISU

AllInForISU

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2012
4,623
4,931
113
I'm totally surprised a second wasn't put on the clock for Ohio State to attempt a winning field goal.

I don’t think he got a first down, so they would have had to call timeout as he was sliding.

Edit: Beat me to it
 

aeroclone

Well-Known Member
Oct 30, 2006
10,365
7,183
113
For everyone on here posting that it is part of the game and get over it and whatever, we as a fanbase still whine about this missed PI call 7 years later.

DPhFd_rVoAABVIG


And Seneca was in.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Peter