Yeah, one of us doesn’t. LOL.You have no clue, and it shows.
Yeah, one of us doesn’t. LOL.You have no clue, and it shows.
NCAA officials are evaluated and graded on every play in a game.
Below is the link on how the process works in the SEC. I know this is similar to other conferences, which you can research at your own leisure.
![]()
SEC Football Officiating Evaluation and Accountability - Southeastern Conference
SEC Football Officiating Evaluation and Accountabilitywww.secsports.com
So if a conference really wants a certain team to win, wouldn’t this be a process to encourage that? Officials need to be evaluated by an uninterested party. Create a national committee to do that (cause the NCAA would **** that up too). Do it like basketball and don’t have conference specific officials.
Any close game there are multiple plays that would change the outcome. Including bad calls. We arent supposed to have bad calls, but they happen, just like dropped passes and missed FGs.Seems like that’s a question for the officials and not a message board poster.
I never said it shouldn’t have been called or that it wasnt a missed call, I just said USC should have never let it get to that.
The officiating is as much of an influence as the players. For example, let’s say an official makes a mistake on 5 plays. Those mistakes can directly influence the outcome of the game. Also, let’s say the team had 5 crucial mistakes, and those 5 mistakes directly had an influence on the outcome of the game.I get really tired of people blowing off referee maleficence all because "Team X didn't do enough to win the game". Should USC not screwed up on their end? Of course. But the refs blowing obvious calls is inexcusable - especially when the call determines the outcome of a game. And us ISU fans have experienced this far too often (and sadly some people would rather blame the team instead of being upset at the ref blowing a call that would have won the game).
The thing you all want to blatantly ignore is if the ref had gotten the call correctly then perhaps the team WOULD have done enough to win the game. No team should have to fight the refs on top of their opponents.
Any close game there are multiple plays that would change the outcome. Including bad calls. We arent supposed to have bad calls, but they happen, just like dropped passes and missed FGs.
The ISSUE here is, are the conference officials protecting teams (miami, psu) in order to get them into the CFP and reap 10s of millions of addl dollars? THAT is the question.
They certainly have means, motive and opportunity. Its easy to understand why these accusations are being made, and its incumbent on the conferences to visibly demonstrate its false. Otherwise you risk becoming the WWE.
I for one hope that we become the big 12 refs’ favorite team.This is a real issue. Conferences just have to keep teams alive, it's existential.
I for one hope that we become the big 12 refs’ favorite team.
I agree. It pays to undefeated and potentially rep the conference in the playoffs. You get the”benefit of the doubt.” Reminds me of the Baylor/TCU fiasco 10 years ago. Big 12 tried to make a decision in that game. Conferences have been playing that game for years now. Too much money involved.There certainly were a lot of favorable calls for Iowa State last night.
This exactly, if they wanted, there would be plenty of justification based on loose interpretation of “when the slide starts “.I'm totally surprised a second wasn't put on the clock for Ohio State to attempt a winning field goal.
It wasn't a first down though so I think it would depend partially on if OSU was trying to call a timeout at the time.This exactly, if they wanted, there would be plenty of justification based on loose interpretation of “when the slide starts “.
I'm totally surprised a second wasn't put on the clock for Ohio State to attempt a winning field goal.
Lincoln Riley’s clock management down the stretch was awful.