Way too many JUCO transfers for McDermott

el tornado

Well-Known Member
Mar 23, 2006
809
282
63
JUCOs are fine.
Jamaal Tinsley brought us our only two conference championships.

If you only recruit h.s. players, they might not even be able to successfully contribute until they are juniors anyway. And if they are THAT good, they just go pro the next year. Or if they go to Iowa State, they transfer. LOL

So Jucos are the way to go!
 

clone11

Member
Jul 12, 2006
502
30
18
Can you please get a better grasp on your threads and posts 1983? I'm assuming your 26 or 27 years old and you start the weakest threads on this site. Thanks.
 

uro cy

Well-Known Member
Oct 28, 2006
3,561
239
63
I like what you did there, went with the bold, yet non-descript statement. It was concise, yet oh so expansive with the endless directions this conversaition could go in. Sure, you could have offered some type of theory or factual basis, but in its simplicity, you have shown your true basketball genious. This post, sir, was a piece of art.
I would have been even better in ALL CAPS....bonus points for bold
 

cyclonenum1

Well-Known Member
Nov 30, 2006
7,191
330
83
That is what's frustrating. There's not much analysis needed, really, because the problem is painfully obvious to everyone with a set of eyes and clear mental capacity.

As you stated, we're heading into year 5 and we still don't have a solid base of talent from which to build. We're looking at (at least) 3 new starters, and not because we graduated a bunch from a successful team.

There was a lot of talk a few years ago about how McDermott was going to do this the "right way" and go after a solid base of 4-year talent. It was going to cost us in the short-term, but we would benefit in the following years when they were all juniors and seniors.

Here we are after 4 seasons, and Mac is scrambling to pick up a bunch of JUCOs late in the game. One of the things that excited me the most about the McDermott hiring was the thought that he would bring stability to the program. *shudders* :confused:

It's hard to get excited about the recruiting process at this point.

Very good post.

The interesting thing on this site is how the GM supporters have twisted themselves into pretzels supporting the guy and have totally changed their "arguments" (errr...excuses) over his four plus year tenure.

For the record, I am not and have never been a "JUCO snob". I am content bringing JUCO guys in if they can play and will make us better. Period. That is my stance today and it was my stance four years ago.

But many on this site did pound their chest early in the GM regime about "doing it the right way" which meant not being reliant on the JUCO route in recruiting. It's interesting that we don't hear much discussion anymore on here about learning the vaunted GM "system" and GM's ability to "develop players"...pretty tough to peddle those points as the rationale for why GM is a "great coach" at this point.

I, like some others, have resigned myself to the fact that we are not going to be moving in a new direction in MBB. I actually am trying not to care as much...but I just cannot do it. I love ISU and I love ISU MBB. It makes me sick to see where our program is right now and even sicker to see how accepting some of our fan base is with this current status.

I shudder to think that if we are at .500 or a game or two over .500 next year that we will have people on here beating their chests about what a great coaching job GM did and how he has turned the corner in "rebuilding" ISU.
 

Cyforce

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2009
17,233
13,068
113
Des Moines
Next year's Freshman class will have at least 3 members and a walk-on that may
be good enough to be on schollie. He currently has one Juco and he has three
years to play.
 

Spam

Well-Known Member
May 21, 2008
7,996
2,666
113
I'm getting sick of us recruiting JUCO thugs and criminals. At Iowa State we want to do things the right way. Academics first, and athletics second. We want to bring in young kids and make men out of them. We don't want to to be paying JuCo coaches to provide us with players. We don't want to turn into Memphis or Kentucky or one of those dirty schools.

Oh wait, Wayne Morgan already left? Never mind. We must be doings with integrity now. We must not be using the lazy, band-aid juco route. And we must be winning.
 

CyCy

Well-Known Member
Nov 7, 2006
1,667
28
48
Most coaches who are trying to build a program start with JUCO players and then transition into mostly HS players later. McD started that way but had to do a u-turn on JUCO's because of all the transfers.

2006 - 2 JUCO, 3 HS
2007 - 6 HS
2008 - 5 HS, 1 JUCO, 1 transfer
2009 - 2 JUCO, 2 HS
2010 - looks like 3-4 JUCO, 2 HS
 

Knownothing

Well-Known Member
Nov 22, 2006
16,649
8,718
113
51
We should never had got Jamal Tinsley, Kantrail Horton, and Michael Nurse all in one year. That would never work.
 

BCforISU

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2008
1,126
50
48
Madison, WI
I'm getting sick of us recruiting JUCO thugs and criminals. At Iowa State we want to do things the right way. Academics first, and athletics second. We want to bring in young kids and make men out of them. We don't want to to be paying JuCo coaches to provide us with players. We don't want to turn into Memphis or Kentucky or one of those dirty schools.

Oh wait, Wayne Morgan already left? Never mind. We must be doings with integrity now. We must not be using the lazy, band-aid juco route. And we must be winning.

What thugs? What problems have any of these kids had? Petty, Haluska, Dendy, Gilstrap, Who are the Thugs? You are way off base and rediculous. Step away from the computer for a few days, or months.....
 

BryceC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 23, 2006
26,462
19,624
113
Cato and Willoughby were not JUCO transfers.

I don't care who we get as long as they can play.
 

clonedude

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2006
33,036
29,276
113
We will be fine going with JUCOs for our two remaining schollies.

Remember, we have 2 freshmen coming in Railey and Ejim. Wilkins will basically be a sophomore. Colvin will be a sophomore too. And GMac will have 4 open scholarships to hand out next year to HS kids.

We just CANNOT afford to lose Colvin. If Colvin goes, then GMac has to go the very next day IMO. He is the person we are going to have to build this team around right now. He is the future at this point in time. Losing Dendy would obviously hurt a lot, but he's a senior. We cannot afford to lose our sophomore stud point guard of the future. That is irreplaceable at this point.
 

CloneIce

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
37,771
21,150
113
Spring recruiting period + holes to fill = JC players.

GM has got to do whatever he can to win as soon as possible.
 

isufan

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 23, 2009
2,473
371
83
SW Iowa
McDermott has had much better luck with Juco players, I'd rather have him going that route at this point than looking for high school players. Then we would just end up with some more Vettes, Bristers, Manns, and Eickmeiers.
 

PJZ

Member
Dec 17, 2007
137
8
18
We should never had got Jamal Tinsley, Kantrail Horton, and Michael Nurse all in one year. That would never work.

I understand your point, but let's be realistic- for every Tinsley, Horton, and Nurse, there is five Cory McIntoshs.