Overrated WR group? Is that why schools like Stanford and Notre Dame offered Lazard? Is that why Montgomery was a top 150 recruit? Come on, they're the one bright part of our team. SBR is terrible and that's why our receivers don't put up great stat lines. I can tell you now that if Lazard were on a team like TCU, he would easily be averaging over 100 yards a game.
SBR had plenty of time the entire game. The o-line wasn't great (other than Campos, who was fantastic), but having five seconds most plays and just sitting around unable to make a decision is bad qb play. Like one other poster said here, look at the amount of times he missed a wide open receiver then threw his hands up to apologize. Our defense was bad, but SBR was worse and a qb is the leader of the team. Stop trying to protect him when he's a big part of the problem.
Yes, that is partially why, in addition to the enormous CF hype. Do you not know what overrated means?
No, our WR are not consistently open with the offense needing only Sam to play well to capitalize on it. Rather, just as in years past, our receivers are predominantly not open and are easy to cover. We lack the ability to stretch the field in addition to guys quickly getting in and out of space. Some of it is on the design of the offense, some Sam, but a lot also on the WR.
Systemic issues, with Sam being the least of our concerns. No QB will ever consistently play well in this offense.