So after they let Mississippi State run the play and UConn gets the ball back, UConn asks for a review and gets the flagrant foul. Why didn't they reset the clock to when the flagrant foul occurred. I didn't reason they could review it if they didn't call a foul in the 1st place. Seems kind of a stupid rule.
That was another beef I had with it. They went back in time to review a play. I think UCONN should have to challenge it or something right away.
It shouldn't even have been reviewed "after the fact", but even if you do allow it, at most it was just a simple foul, but in no way was it a flagrant 1. That was total BS. If MSU had lost that game from that, there should have been outrage over it.