I see that you have been talking to the TAMU supporters regarding spin-doctoring the negative fallout of MU's possible decision to leave the Big 12.
Everybody else in the country (apart from TAMU and MU) has enough common sense to realize that in this era of bowl qualification standards and the BCS, when you leave a conference, you are causing circumstances that make it very difficult for your former conference mates to continue rivalries with you. In fact the more you try to blame your former conference mates for not continuing the rivalry games, the more dumb and more pathetic you look.
In KC, there are only 3 groups of people who care about this: MU fans, KU and KSU fans, and the business/government leaders who stand to lose money. And from my perspective, only one group's opinion should count.
The business and government leaders don't "support" MU or KU or KSU, for the most part. They just want butts in seats, whether it's to pay the bills for their arena, hotel, restaurant, etc. They REALLY don't care if the remaining Big 12 has hurt feelings about Missouri's departure. We're ready to keep the money flowing for them - but not to detriment of the ENTIRE university.
KU and KSU fans (and the rest of the Big 12) are probably going to reject any offers to play MU in KC. Fine...if we were THAT concerned about not playing them again, we wouldn't have left. But don't think that the business interests give a damn about the Big 12 beyond the dollars it can bring in. They're in the middle, and they're going to "side" with anybody willing to generate tourism in their city.
We are. The rest of Big 12 is not.
Or maybe you're right, and we're so "dumb and pathetic" that the KC venues will boycott us too, and not let us play there. But I wouldn't count on it.