Yeah, go ahead and jump.
Yeah, go ahead and jump.
Now now, I thought we had a talk about beating your dead horse.This is the likely outcome I see as well. Saying you are open to expansion is good press and makes the conference appear powerful/thoughtful. They don’t look bad when they say no at that point. The Big 12 will have to expand to survive and a hit to the athletics department is coming.
If the Pac moves to expand, they'll probably need to look at adding more than 4. I doubt the B1G will sit around and just watch it happen. Wouldn't be surprised if that move by the Pac is followed by a similar move by the B1G with USC, UCLA, Oregon, Wash.
so you’re assuming Iowa state ends up in the Mac then?
Yeah. Kansas State, Oklahoma State, and Texas Tech.
What part also involves kevin warren being competent? He can’t get out of his own way.What part of these people talking an alliance between conferences includes pillaging each other?
Jesus no. The AAC or Mountain West would gladly take us before that. Absolute worst-case scenario of course. I think we'd become part of a "make the Mountain West Great Again" campaign along with TCU, Baylor, and BYU. Possibly Kansas.
What part of these people talking an alliance between conferences includes pillaging each other?
The nut cup move (that I am expecting to happen) is the Pac-12 saying that they aren’t going to expand. The B1G and ACC would likely follow suit.
I'd think the 'alliance' is a short-term middle finger to the SECESPN letting it know that it's not going to overtake anything. But when push comes to shove, there's no way the B1G is going to march in lockstep with the Pac/ACC level in terms of expansion. It's going to do what's best for the conference, and the simple fact is the B1G is operating from a much stronger position. If divvying up the remaining Big 12 schools isn't in the B1G's best interest, it's not going to happen.
So you’re saying that the pac would take 2 schools we have bigger followings than, and a mountain West team before they would take Iowa State?
You mean the most likely outcome in all of this?Now now, I thought we had a talk about beating your dead horse.
I'm saying geography matters.
And then you get somebody like in post #52 who shows up 3 pages in stating exactly what was said in the opening page of posts.I love these threads, always at least 1 guy who has a take he is just 150% firm on and will double/triple/quadruple down on it. Never fails. The day UNLV gets an invite to a P5 conference will be the day there are no more P5 conferences.
Doing that after the recent alliance discussions between the Big Ten, PAC 12 and ACC would be a more nefarious act than what OU, UT and the SEC just pulled off.
You mean the most likely outcome in all of this?