Yeah I can't imagine the NCAA brass rallying behind Mulkey as the poster child of WBB.I saw some people hinting at that kind of language but not outright calling it a conspiracy or whatever. I chalked it up to sour grapes.
Yeah I can't imagine the NCAA brass rallying behind Mulkey as the poster child of WBB.I saw some people hinting at that kind of language but not outright calling it a conspiracy or whatever. I chalked it up to sour grapes.
Well she’s the only reason a bunch of people started watching women’s basketball so I guess rules of the game should not be applied to her? Iowa’s men’s team does the constant more subtle delay of game move by constantly whacking the ball after they score so they can set up their press.Well. Chucking the ball in a tantrum is ridiculous too.
That’s funny. She’s got the ball and the official is right in front of her. Rather than give the official the ball she chucks it behind the back away from the official and out of bounds.Refs were awful all the way around, didn't really affect one team more than the other IMO. Except maybe for that 'T'. That was ridiculous.
Why would the NCAA want to intentionally screw the biggest star in WBB out of winning a championship? I keep seeing people say(not all Hawk fans) that the game was not reffed fairly towards both ends and that "you know why" they wouldn't want Clark to be a national champion, which is why the game was fixed for LSU.
But I actually do not know why. At all. I'm beyond confused. Someone help.
Agreed. LSU was a million times better at stopping penetration compared to South Carolina. Clark was mostly forced to shoot 3s. She hit quite a few, but they're a different team when she can't go downhill and hit her teammates for open layups or threes.LSU knew how to stop the pick and roll.
Creates a massive redemption story for her next year. ESPN can spin this Iowa team for an entire year about their hunt for a natty.Why would the NCAA want to intentionally screw the biggest star in WBB out of winning a championship? I keep seeing people say(not all Hawk fans) that the game was not reffed fairly towards both ends and that "you know why" they wouldn't want Clark to be a national champion, which is why the game was fixed for LSU.
But I actually do not know why. At all. I'm beyond confused. Someone help.
I thought the refs were poor all around - over-officiating like others have said. Both teams had some calls go against them that probably shouldn't have. The Clark technical might tip the scales into the refs being just a little worse for Iowa, but we'd be talking about a difference of couple of points... not 17.
Iowa's strategy against South Carolina and LSU was the same --
-- we're smaller but more skilled/better shooters/have the ur-shooter of women's basketball
-- pack it in and make them shoot over us/crash the defensive glass to give ourselves a chance
-- South Carolina responded to this by playing an extremely ugly form of basketball where they would miss outside shots and hope to score in the scrum for offensive rebounds (which they often pulled down because they were bigger and stronger than Iowa's posts) or to draw a foul on putting back putbacks
-- South Carolina hung with Iowa but, in the end, Clark making three is better than a post making two
-- they tried the same thing against LSU, but LSU made its outside shots, game over
I don't think the officiating was great, but you when your game plan is allowing so many open threes and just hoping the other team doesn't make them and they make them... then that is on you.
Looked to me like more of a swat than her "chucking" the ball. Opinions are going to vary but if the refs are going to go letter-of-the-law on that then they should be consistently letter-of-the-law on other things. I'm guessing there's something in the rule book about a coach roaming on the court and making contact with a ref while the game is in play. Be consistent.That’s funny. She’s got the ball and the official is right in front of her. Rather than give the official the ball she chucks it behind the back away from the official and out of bounds.
She’s an incredible player, but she is constantly showing up officials and opponents (see Louisville game).
But not surprising that the dumb media in this state like to ignore this. When you have the media trot out the “Kirk is a good man” nonsense, it isn’t surprising.
Looked to me like more of a swat than her "chucking" the ball. Opinions are going to vary but if the refs are going to go letter-of-the-law on that then they should be consistently letter-of-the-law on other things. I'm guessing there's something in the rule book about a coach roaming on the court and making contact with a ref while the game is in play. Be consistent.
LSU knew how to stop the pick and roll.
Well. Chucking the ball in a tantrum is ridiculous too.
I thought these were some of the worst refs I've seen in a long long time...both ways. They didn't win the game for LSU by any means but they were badI didn't watch any of the game so this is an honest question. Were the refs terrible both ways? Because I see that Iowa ended up with just one more foul than LSU.
LSU is much more balanced offensively than SC.