Both men and women's final four's were a joke this year.
The men's was great fun in my viewing. Don't know what you mean.
Both men and women's final four's were a joke this year.
The men's was great fun in my viewing. Don't know what you mean.
Is there that few of quality players in women's bball?
Yes and the best players go to uconnUConn won the tourney games by like a combined 239 points if my quick in my head math was right. That is nearly a 40 point win margin... In the damn NCAA tournament. How exciting. Didn't have a single game this year in single digits that I could see. Had 2 that were 10 point victories. Is there that few of quality players in women's bball?
It's way harder in men'sWhy is there such a gap between women's and men's dominance?
I think there is a bigger gap in Women's players with elite talent (a la britney griner, candance parker, etc.) and their average d1 counterpart than there is in mens. Griner reminded me of watching Wilt Chamberlain play on espn classic, in that he just imposed his will on folks.Why is there such a gap between women's and men's dominance?
Why is there such a gap between women's and men's dominance?
I would go back to what Geno said in an interview...women's players don't practice (all the "good" ones do is play games on traveling teams) which leads to a lack of skill when it comes to the fine details of the game. That is a huge detriment to developing the type of players needed to fill rosters in D1.
“When they show up in college, you hear how someone was a first-team All-American in high school,†Auriemma said. “Then you watch them play for a half an hour and you go, ‘Wow. What are the coaches doing with the players on that team who weren’t first-team All-American?’ I would kill myself if I was coaching those guys.â€
Female players of today can run faster, jump higher and are better in terms of athletic skills. But the ability to play five-on-five basketball doesn’t exist, according to Auriemma.
no early entry for pros in women's game. If the Duke's and Kentucky's of the world kept their players for all four years they would dominate the men's game.
I don't know that they'd necessarily dominate, but that is probably the single biggest factor. Others:
*15 scholarships available in WBB vs 13 in MBB
*WBB players are more likely to accept being a role player on a great team vs being a star on an average to good team. Some of that is because of no huge NBA contracts to look forward to, and some is likely a general gender personality difference.
*Smaller pool of players to draw from (fewer girls in sports overall for a wide variety of reasons) means the truly great players are a lot less common.
The only other thing I would add is degrees matter much more to girls because that is their likely future. So Stanford, Duke, Notre Dames of the world have a leg up there too.
Completely bogus. The women's game within itself is incredibly tough. I would put their individual skills up against any man within their sport. Long range shooting? Every bit as good. Free throw shooting...I would bet women are better overall. Guard play and distributing the ball. Even. The list goes on. You can't compare the sports against each other...you have to look within the given sport itself.It's way harder in men's