If the Iowa Choke Eyes are soooo gooood how did they ever lose to the worst team in the bigxii @ HOME.
Im waiting for an answer Choke Eye Fans.....
The Jerry Kill Comparison
- Thread starter Cyvet95
- Start date
If the Iowa Choke Eyes are soooo gooood how did they ever lose to the worst team in the bigxii @ HOME.
Im waiting for an answer Choke Eye Fans.....
Upsets happen all the time in all sports. The IOWA game means a whole lot more to ISU then it does to IOWA, IOWA has the overall advantage 40-22. I used this example earlier. LSU won the NT with a 12-2 record. They lost to Kentucky #17 and an unranked Arkansas team. Does anyone think that the either of those two teams is better then LSU in this yr.? I doubt it.
you're not using "facts". you're just taking your own silly *** opinions and stating them as such.
apples to oranges. it's not an "upset" when two bad teams play and one is marginally better on that day than the other. When ISU beat Iowa in '02 and Iowa went on to go 11-1, that would be considered an upset. this year, not at all. And stop with the "game means more to ISU than it does with Iowa". that's nothing more than BS rhetoric your fanbase uses to rationalize losing consistently over the past decade and a half to a team you feel is beneath you.
Iowa is the primary benefactor of getting to play in the softest half of the weakest BCS conference in college football this year. congrats on going .500 with that schedule. huge accomplishment!
But when you get beat 10 out of 17 times in recent history, it means ISU is the better program, clearly. The Iowa game only means more to ISU for one reason....Iowa is perennially one of the easiest games on our schedule that we normally have to win it to go Bowling because most of the rest of our schedule is one of the top 5 hardest in the nation year in and year out. Iowa can lose the game and still win the weak *** Big 11. That's not our problem, that's Iowa's. Take a mediocre Iowa team out and replace it with a real team and our schedule probably IS the hardest in the nation in most years. Not because its our Super Bowl as you Egomaniac, Self Absorbed, Idiotic Iowa fans fail to realize. It's because you are easy pickings.
#44 IOWA losing to #103 ISU is an upset in everyones book. Soft conference please.. Big 10 40 National Titles, Big 12 has 19. ISU has had 6 winning seasons, zero double digit win seasons, zero conference titles, zero Jan. Bowls. ( in the Ferentz era ) meanwhile IOWA has had only 4 losing seasons, 4 double digit win seasons, 2 conference titles and multiple Jan. Bowls. Then Stanzi has won 3 as qb, that is the entire win total for ISU.. Facts show ISU not even close..
You have to be drunk already to even think of let alone believe this garbage. Look at an earlier comment comparing the two side by side during Ferentz era. NO ISU does not play the 5th hardest yr in and out. Their SOS right now is in the low 40's while IOWA is in the low 50's... ISU #103 and IOWA #44. Yes it is ISU superbowl. I live 10 miles from Ames and have all my life. Know Ia City very well. It is the main goal for ISU..
Conference history has what bearing on the current state of the big ten? The big ten is extremely soft these days. Pretty much anyone familiar with college football agrees on that. and program history has nothing to do with ISU being better than Iowa THIS YEAR.
By your logic, Minnesota is 100x the football program that Iowa is and is a national power. After all, they've won 7 National Championships.
You're either making a concerted effort to troll or you're 13. I can't put my finger on exactly which quite yet.
Easy now. No one claimed they'd win this game. Don't throw rocks if you live in a glass house....or something
I think there is good debate in here until the derp came in for the last 4-5 pages
I can agree ISU would be able to compete as no one scores many points outside of OSU and MSU is pretty solid too.
Good thing, too. Down 14-0 now.
Wanted to try to get this thread back on track and away from the douchiness of the Iowa vs. ISU debate.
