Cameron Lard Thread

CyFan61

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2010
14,540
273
83
Morris probably wont leave. Who would transfer? Ernst? Ashton is averaging 12 mpg in conference play, not really walk on PT.

I guess option 4 in addition to the three I listed is that one of the incoming freshmen - maybe Lard, maybe somebody else - never makes it to campus.

So it has to be at least one of those things since there are 14 guys that could have a scholarship for next year right now and 13 to give out. Monte goes, somebody transfers, Ashton goes back to walk-on, Naz plays this year after all (I guess this is technically possible), or one of the freshmen/jucos never shows up.
 
Last edited:

swarthmoreCY

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2008
16,374
736
83
Here nor there
So even tho he's performed better than Cooke you take away his scholarship?
Does he have a scholarship next year to take away?

I am a big Ashton fan and he has certainly earned his scholarship for this year. With his Big 12-level shooting and lack of a major weakness he is a Big 12 level player. But we have a ton of guys at his spot that are likely ahead of him. And he came here to walkon. It is the first option you exploit to make room for a guy that would see major minutes. If Prohm thinks Ashton is more valuable in his senior year than another guy will be in his two remaining years, then maybe he Prohm helps the other guy to find a new home instead.
 

CyFan61

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2010
14,540
273
83
Does he have a scholarship next year to take away?

I am a big Ashton fan and he has certainly earned his scholarship for this year. With his Big 12-level shooting and lack of a major weakness he is a Big 12 level player. But we have a ton of guys at his spot that are likely ahead of him. And he came here to walkon. It is the first option you exploit to make room for a guy that would see major minutes. If Prohm thinks Ashton is more valuable in his senior year than another guy will be in his two remaining years, then maybe he Prohm helps the other guy to find a new home instead.

If worst comes to worst and ISU has 14 guys that it wants for 13 spots (a good problem to have anyway), I bet you are right and Prohm will pull the Hoiberg "Richard Amardi to Oregon" move and send the least valuable one to another school that wants him and that the player wants to play at. Win-win-win. That's the business
 
  • Like
Reactions: swarthmoreCY

swarthmoreCY

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2008
16,374
736
83
Here nor there
I really think Malou is more than capable of guarding a 5 and it would allow us to go small. He's 6-9 so it's not like we'd be starting a 6-6/6-7 guy there. I watched a Yuba replay from about a week before he came to Iowa and Malou was posting up all game, guarding the other team's 5 and he was rebounding and blocking shots consistently. I don't know if we'll see him on the perimeter as much as I thought we would. His 3 point % dipped a bit this season at Yuba.
Well I guess it can't be too much worse than what we have had in terms of man-to-man post defense recently. I wonder if we would see even more zone in this event. Is Wayne Morgan still in Ames?
 

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
13,051
21,037
113
Not to disprespect, but if Carter is our starting '5' , we are in for a long year.
Big guys typically improve a great deal going into year two. I'm not saying he's going great next year, but I think it's reasonable to think he can be serviceable and play a lot of minutes.
 

acgclone

Well-Known Member
Feb 21, 2007
12,037
3,769
113
Big guys typically improve a great deal going into year two. I'm not saying he's going great next year, but I think it's reasonable to think he can be serviceable and play a lot of minutes.

He is a long way off but occasionally you see really big improvement from one year to the next
 

acgclone

Well-Known Member
Feb 21, 2007
12,037
3,769
113
It's plausible, but I think it's much more reasonable to think he can't.


I'm torn on this. Carter has looked really far off. On the other hand, he appears to have a great attitude and all the tools needed to be a good player.

I really think he was set back due to not having any time with the team this summer and missing out on the foreign trip.

Look at Diallo's struggles as an example of how hard it is for FR who are set back.
 

swarthmoreCY

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2008
16,374
736
83
Here nor there
I'm torn on this. Carter has looked really far off. On the other hand, he appears to have a great attitude and all the tools needed to be a good player.

I really think he was set back due to not having any time with the team this summer and missing out on the foreign trip.

Look at Diallo's struggles as an example of how hard it is for FR who are set back.
Could be. I am basing it off of the zero minutes Prohm is investing in him. Imo if he is able to make the jump in 8 months and "be our 5", he should be seeing (or soon see) at least some minutes when up by double digits against poorer Big 12 competition. Maybe that is a Prohm thing and not a Carter thing. Now, if we are talking about him improving enough to be an occasionally used backup like Edozie? Sure.

I am hesitant to compare our situation to that of KU. KU annually has 4 and 5 star underclassmen on the bench. Self demands more on defense and rebounding from his starters and always has other options. Lucus, Mickelson, and Traylor would all see a lot of PT. Imo so would Diallo or Bragg.
 
Last edited:

CyFan61

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2010
14,540
273
83
Apparently we are guessing about starters for next year, so I will throw in right now on Jackson, Mitrou-Long, Thomas, Burton, and Malou being the first five that ISU puts on the floor next year.
 

swarthmoreCY

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2008
16,374
736
83
Here nor there
Top Juco PG, experienced B12 SG, experienced B12 SG, top juco C/PF and Burton in the 5th spot? Sounds good to me unless we get a lottery pick PF.
Optimistically it sounds like a good supporting cast without any proven difference makers. Pessimistically it sounds a lot like the teams you see in the bottom tier of Big 12 standings.

Unknown, role player, role player, unknown SF forced to play PF/C, a 6'4" PF that does know how to play (defense or offense). Mostly all unknown underclassmen behind them. Honestly it does not look any better than the starting lineup on Fred's first team.
 

cyclonenation5

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jul 12, 2013
2,800
2,063
113
Ames
Optimistically it sounds like a good supporting cast without any proven difference makers. Pessimistically it sounds a lot like the teams you see in the bottom tier of Big 12 standings.

Unknown, role player, role player, unknown SF forced to play PF/C, a 6'4" PF that does know how to play (defense or offense). Mostly all unknown underclassmen behind them. Honestly it does not look any better than the starting lineup on Fred's first team.

This is a stupid debate but calling Naz a role player is even stupider. Guy is a proven starter and double digit scorer. Is anything less than first team All-Big 12 a role player for you?
 

swarthmoreCY

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2008
16,374
736
83
Here nor there
This is a stupid debate but calling Naz a role player is even stupider. Guy is a proven starter and double digit scorer. Is anything less than first team All-Big 12 a role player for you?
No.

A lot of proven starters, even ones that are double digit scorers are role players. He is a supporting cast guy. I would really enjoy a discussion involving the taxonomy of basketball players with you, but first you shouldn't be so quick to assign such a negative connotation to the term role player.
 

Gibbon

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
460
784
93
Ames
Next years starting 5 isn't committed yet. He'll be a graduate transfer or a Juco.

A graduate transfer big man is by far and away the best thing that could happen in the off-season for ISU basketball. We need a true big man next year to rebound and defend down low.