Is it possible to be in both crowds? I can appreciate the argument that when they hit 18 threes he's a genius, but when they miss similarly open looks he looks like a "bad coach." I get that.
But I also think that people in that "camp" need to realize there is more to it than that. This team obviously has an issue coming ready to play. The KSU game is about the only conference game I can remember where we had a pulse to start the game. Now, to be fair, Fred had this issue too. But some of that falls on Coach Prohm to find a way to have them ready to play.
I also cannot remember the last time we scored on an out-of-bounds play. I can't remember the last baseline out of bounds that didn't result in a contested heave out around half court, or a difficult pass to a guy in the corner. Along with that, I believe if Matt didn't get that shot off last night that makes either 3-4 games where we didn't even get a shot off when we needed a last second bucket to tie or take the lead. These are two areas that we struggle in that coaching plays a large part in.
As for his rotation, I can see both sides there. He does do some things that make me scratch my head, but at the same time, I realize he's really limited in his options. Whose fault that is-- you can be the judge.
So I'm not going to go as far as saying he can't coach, but to even the most ardent Prohm supporter I'd hope you can see some legitimate concerns regarding focus and execution that are, at least in part, on the coach.
Also, if coaching basketball comes down to nothing more than they made shots/ they didn't make shots, I'll gladly do Prohm's job at half of what he's making. If you believe coaching makes a difference, you have to believe there's more to it than making/missing shots on a given night, right?