Who specifically do you feel was more deserving of a #2 seed than Ohio State? The #3 seeds were 19-7 Texas, 20-8 Kansas, 18-9 West Virginia and 22-6 Arkansas. You gonna give that #2 seed to one of the PAC-12 teams? Make a case base on their resume as of Selection Sunday.
You can't just say "they didn't deserve it" without naming what you feel was a better option.
Lots of teams won a regular season title, conference tournament title or had a better record than Ohio State. Like a dozen.
I think we might need to change what we look at in criteria if it's just straight Net ranking (ohio State's #8 net ranking gets them the 2 seed but Loyolya's #10 net ranking somehow doesn't get them a 3 seed but all the way down to an 8 seed).
This is not a 2 seed:
Ohio State had lost 5 of their last 9 games
Ohio State didn't win their conference tournament
Ohio State lost 9 games
Ohio State finished 5th in their conference, not 5th in the nation like a 2 seed, 5th in their conference.
12-8 conference record, that is not 2 seed worthy.
You're just being obtuse if you can't imagine a criteria where that isn't a top 8 team in the nation.
The only reason they're a 2 seed is if we all think the Big Ten was 20x better than the other conferences, it wasn't. That was a sham. It was a super average conference with one good team in Michigan and bunch of bad teams at the bottom unlike the Big 12 with only a couple bad teams.