CycloneErik
Well-Known Member
Someone has to be at fault. Accept the consequences!
Oops, nevermind, Malone did.![]()
Will do.
Someone has to be at fault. Accept the consequences!
Oops, nevermind, Malone did.![]()
It was like he did a shot of the hard stuff and went to a darker place.
ZRF needs to go to practice and tell the players of his critiques.
Good analysis. Wilson is very good but that is as good as he can be. We need to guard **** a little better and we need to make a few more shots, especially easy shots. That was pretty much as good as Kansas can play. We can play way better.Not everything is just bad luck. In Ames, we played well enough that those guys didn't make those shots. We were a bit slow and off tonight. It wasn't a bad performance at all. But in order to beat Kansas WE needed to be better and stop Wilson from 'having a lottery pick' kind of night. I do think this is the kind of game where we probably missed good Caleb a bit.
What I liked about tonight was that we still looked fairly sharp. We didn't get that deer in the headlights look that we had for most of February. And we didn't freeze up when we got down by 8 in the first half. It was really good to see that this turnaround wasn't limited to Baylor.
If we play Kansas again, I'll get a toupee to offset the Toupee Bill effect. Unless he is coaching, then I won't get a toupee because they generally look ridiculous.I’m chalking this up to Trey Lance jinx, unless he was there yesterday, then I’ve got nothing. Or addition by substraction, Toupee Bill is sidelined
This is what I see. Our A game can beat anybody. Our B game can't beat a really good team's A games. If we can time our B games with other good team's B games we will go deep. Does this make any sense? I find the alphabet confusing.Met up with the A game of the #1 overall seed, with our B game.
ON TO MARCH MADNESS!!!
Yep, completely. If we play defense and rebound like we have been, an average offensive outing should be enough unless the other team is on fire from the outside, and when we're firing on all cylinders, even the top teams are going to have serious problems with us.This is what I see. Our A game can beat anybody. Our B game can't beat a really good team's A games. If we can time our B games with other good team's B games we will go deep. Does this make any sense? I find the alphabet confusing.
Thanks for restating that in a way that makes more sense. I blame the beer and lack of intelligence.Yep, completely. If we play defense and rebound like we have been, an average offensive outing should be enough unless the other team is on fire from the outside, and when we're firing on all cylinders, even the top teams are going to have serious problems with us.
Lunardi is garbage when it comes to seeding. We'll be a 5 http://www.bracketmatrix.com/rankings.htmlLunardi still has us as a 4. I dont see it but we'll see.
Does the men’s team go home tonight or Saturday?
Overall, no. But a 13 point beat down hurts a little. Would've liked to have kept it respectable. That was one of the most lopsided losses in the P6 tournaments so farMeh not too worried about that loss.
Overall, no. But a 13 point beat down hurts a little. Would've liked to have kept it respectable. That was one of the most lopsided losses in the P6 tournaments so far
“13 point beat down” lololololOverall, no. But a 13 point beat down hurts a little. Would've liked to have kept it respectable. That was one of the most lopsided losses in the P6 tournaments so far
Stuff like this is totally uncalled for. This poster must think he's bigger, better, smarter, when in fact, he is none of those. Sounds like an internet bully to me, with a personality disorder - meanness.Malone must have deleted that post or a mod did but that needs to be quoted and he needs a time out or something for that kind of ****.
I know you've seen it by now. Lucky you.Missed it