I think it will be a different game if we can lay him out a couple times in the first quarter.Wait till his ass gets pancaked a few times and he'll wish he was a backup at his old school again.
I think it will be a different game if we can lay him out a couple times in the first quarter.Wait till his ass gets pancaked a few times and he'll wish he was a backup at his old school again.
You make a lot of sense but abandoning the wide screens and forcing the opponent to cover the entire field are opposite arguments. I could see throwing the sideline screens less often but if you throw it out of the playbook you allow the corners to cheat deeper and don't ever make them pay for it.We utilized more play action, actually snapped it under center (notably on the sneak) and had improved protection schemes and splits at the line.
But yes, there were still too many Manning moments. We have never had or shown we've had the personnel to run the WR screens with any sort of consistency yet we still run them. It's usually a ceded down to the opposition and we are fortunate not go backwards on half of those plays. Please get that out of the play book.
Even more important is the receiver routes and depths, ie the route trees of the offense. For years we have done a terrible job at utilizing and making defenses defend the entire field. We constantly have receivers running mid routes at teh same depth making us easy to defend. What's more as we have rarely shown the ability to protect for the type of routes we run. Our QBs are under duress in 2-3 seconds and they have nowhere to throw the ball.
We have a young QB and I'd like to see more utilizing of the middle of the field...some quick slants and crosses, as well as more misdirection. I really liked the deep shots we took last game and REALLY liked Bechts ability to see the field and throw on the run. Let's create some time with some ingenuity and give him some easy throws that get VERTICAL yards.
There were encouraging signs but it wasn't perfect. We will need more diversity and creativity against Iowa.
Those short screens really act as an extension of the running game too. Sure, you don't break very many, but a lot of them will get 4-5 yards, which is as good as a decent run.You make a lot of sense but abandoning the wide screens and forcing the opponent to cover the entire field are opposite arguments. I could see throwing the sideline screens less often but if you throw it out of the playbook you allow the corners to cheat deeper and don't ever make them pay for it.
I agree that they need to attack at every place on the field to stretch the D including throwing deep balls and mid crossing routes but you can't abandon any part of the field and really be stretching the defense.
this is pretty good.
Does it seem to anyone else that this people are paying less attention to this year's game than ever before? Granted, I don't live in Iowa so maybe there's more in person interest. But the internet is pretty much crickets. And, what's more, its a nationally televised game, middle of the day game.
Nobody in Iowa is talking about anything else.
Nobody is in right field. I think. Somebody's in left and Who's on 1st. I'm not sure where He is.
Two unranked teams in a game that's a spectactle for all of the wrong reasons. I'm slightly annoyed that it doesn't get any real discussion nationally and has turned into something everyone mocks.Does it seem to anyone else that this people are paying less attention to this year's game than ever before? Granted, I don't live in Iowa so maybe there's more in person interest. But the internet is pretty much crickets. And, what's more, its a nationally televised game, middle of the day game.
this is pretty good.
I also thought with the hawks being a worldwide brand that that monk would know who they are too.Thought Rutgers was the rage in NY for the BTN
this is pretty good.
I told someone at work in Madison that it was the Cy-Hawk game. blank stare haha. Most people in Madison have heard of Hawkeyes and never heard of the cyclones. If you say "Iowa State, 50/50 chance they say "oh, the Hawkeyes?"Just living up the road in WI and it's not a whole lot different. People know the schools at least a bit but have no idea about the game.
Haha! Yea, the Wisconsin Muskrats!!!I told someone at work in Madison that it was the Cy-Hawk game. blank stare haha. Most people in Madison have heard of Hawkeyes and never heard of the cyclones. If you say "Iowa State, 50/50 chance they say "oh, the Hawkeyes?"
I've got to be honest, with the reduced tailgate time, mess at the gates and the announcement of this turning into a political rally, I considered selling my tickets and parking pass. I'm leaving Illinois at 2:30 in the morning to get to the game, so a day filled with hassles, isn't all that appealing to me. I wonder how many felt like me and ultimately decided it's easier to tailgate at home and watch it on TV.Can’t believe how cheap tickets are. Get in price is less than $100 with tons of tix between $100-$150.
Ok, give me a Puke, @IASTATE07, I overdid it! But have some fun! No harm. Or was it too pre-boomer? I didn't know anyone was counting.Nobody is in right field. I think. Somebody's in left and Who's on 1st. I'm not sure where He is.![]()
I told someone at work in Madison that it was the Cy-Hawk game. blank stare haha. Most people in Madison have heard of Hawkeyes and never heard of the cyclones. If you say "Iowa State, 50/50 chance they say "oh, the Hawkeyes?"
To be fair, I mostly talk to academic types. I once met a PhD student at UW who had lived in Madison for 7 years and didn't know the difference between the packers and badgersI've met plenty of people that know about ISU and think Ames is a nice place etc. but most are clueless about hardly any teams outside of the B1G region and (understandably) have no idea about Cyhawk.
Well I'd give you a raise if I was in charge.Was on an intra-work conference call with about 40 people this AM and somebody said something about the game and I blurted out **** Iowa, not realizing I wasn't on mute. I'm waiting for my HR invite.
To be fair, I mostly talk to academic types. I once met a PhD student at UW who had lived in Madison for 7 years and didn't know the difference between the packers and badgers