Big 12 in talks with organizations to sell naming rights, ownership stake, according to reports

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,509
74,255
113
Ankeny
Is there really brand recognition for Big 12, though? The conference is changing so much. I wouldn't care if it was the AllState 12 for a few years, then the Texaco 12, then something else.

Some in the conference thought this earlier. JP talked about it and about renaming after they added Houston\UCF\Cincy\BYU and the new schools were the ones who didn't want to change the name because they thought it had brand value
 

ClubCy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 8, 2023
4,278
6,747
113
Is there really brand recognition for Big 12, though? The conference is changing so much. I wouldn't care if it was the AllState 12 for a few years, then the Texaco 12, then something else.

I don't think NASCAR has had a lot of issues going from Winston Cup to Nextel Cup to Sprin tCup to Monster Energy NASCAR cup to NASCAR cup.

That said, I'd prefer INSERT COMPANY HERE Big 12, but I don't think its a big deal either way.

I'm curious about the private equity. What does a 20% share actually mean? Does that mean that firm gets 20% of all revenue? They just distributed $470M to schools this year. 20% of that would be $94M. If an equity firm paid $1B, it'd take them 11 years to profit on it, right?

If a team lost 20% of their payout this year, that'd be about $7M. However if they got a 1/16 of the $1B, that's a $62.5M influx of cash. Would getting $62.5M up front be worth losing 20% going forward long term? I don't know, but I'd imagine there are numbers where it would be worth it.
Yes. The conference of leftovers who don’t play defense. :rolleyes:
 

cymonw1980

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 23, 2015
1,058
1,816
113
Raleigh, NC
I need to understand the “20%” ownership in the conference and how the private equity owners would be compensated.

This does not make sense to me if you have to pay them 20% of your rev forever in exchange for $1B now unless the conference has plans to use the $1B to invest in opportunities for new revenue in the future.

For example, if the conference believes the money can be used to create new revenue streams worth $200M/yr (making it up) then maybe you do it? But even then, you only make a few million/ team if you have to pay them 20% of total rev (20% x 700M = 140M, 700M is roughly 500M this yr plus the “new” 200M). Seems risky… but what do I know?
 

Proton

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
Aug 19, 2019
780
1,479
93
Twenty minutes in to Williams and Blum talking about this…the Allstate Conference or whatever. Keep finding myself shaking my head and saying f*** this b***s***
I love Williams and Blum btw, but this sucks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clone2003

Jer

CF Founder, Creator
Feb 28, 2006
23,580
23,427
10,030
Posted in the original thread...

On one hand, we're screwed because the only way to increase revenue is by either selling rights (i.e. name) or getting in bed with private equity. People need to realize that Private Equity is awesome for startups, but is like a cash advance for a large enterprise. They either cut costs to increase profits or they wait until the value is high and sell... at which point the "Allstate 12 Sponsored by Dr Pepper" won't get that increased value, the PE firm does.

On the other hand, we're falling further behind the big dogs far more than people realize. It isn't just the big dollar amount of the media deal, it's also going to be iterative gaps like playoff payout, etc that keep adding extra $5mil/yr here and $4mil/yr there, etc. The result is that what $3mil/yr means to Iowa State is peanuts for what it means for Iowa. That means we have to do things that would normally feel gross in order to keep the gap somewhat manageable.

You now calculate another $22mil/yr out of the AD budget and bam, massive gap. You think that $22mil/yr is going to be made up by increased donors at a school like Iowa State? Think again. The P1 will be more likely to backfill. That ignores the fact that NIL is never going away - it is endorsement money that is largely beyond regulation/limitations.

The only other option is the P2 stops trying to compete with the P1 and accepts it's basically now Division 2 - which sucks too.

There is no "good" answer, it's just trying to find the one(s) that gives the most stability, equality with our peers, and minimizes the massive impacts to AD budgets coming up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JimmyChitwood

2speedy1

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2014
6,636
7,492
113
I mean according to the media people it probably should be"

The Iowa 80 12
The Loves 12
The T/A 12
The Pilot 12
Bu-cee's 12
Flying J 12

Etc etc.
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,809
24,912
113
I'm not so sure.

The Big Ten presented by Northwestern Mutual or the SEC presented by Capital One isn't terribly obtrusive

I’m not sure those would be worth anything near what the Big12 is looking at. Having your name in every conversation around the conference is worth a lot more than tacking it on to the end of the name. Everyone will continue to just use the Big10 and SEC names without mentioning the sponsor.

Take a look at the Big12 championship game. Do you ever refer to it as the Dr Pepper Big12 Championship game?
 

1UNI2ISU

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2013
9,037
12,150
113
Waterloo
I’m not sure those would be worth anything near what the Big12 is looking at. Having your name in every conversation around the conference is worth a lot more than tacking it on to the end of the name. Everyone will continue to just use the Big10 and SEC names without mentioning the sponsor.

Take a look at the Big12 championship game. Do you ever refer to it as the Dr Pepper Big12 Championship game?
I don't but every single time it's mentioned on TV it is. That's where the value is when you combine it with on court/on field advertising.
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,809
24,912
113
I don't but every single time it's mentioned on TV it is. That's where the value is when you combine it with on court/on field advertising.

During the broadcast yes. But the money is having the sportscenter highlights refer to the Allstate 12 every week. Just having your company name become synonymous with the conference is huge.

It’s like the Winston Cup, the Sears Trophy, or the Tostitos Bowl. It’s different than the Sugar Bowl presented by Allstate.
 

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,134
7,734
113
Dubuque
There’s no way either of those would consider a conference name change. Too much history in the name.
They might not be willing to go to the same lengths as the Big12. But they could take half steps that might be just as valuable.
 

NodawayRiverClone

Well-Known Member
May 1, 2018
376
333
63
76
Dropping down to the school level, Texas has Bevo, TAM has the collie, Colorado has Ralphie. Rather than having the expense of a live animal, sell rights to companies - get John Deere to run a remote control tractor around the field pulling an electric driven fan blowing sideways into the lower stands. Put bball players in the cab for NIL money.
 
  • Love
Reactions: BigCyFan

Cycsk

Year-round tailgater
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 17, 2009
28,412
17,340
113
There’s no way either of those would consider a conference name change. Too much history in the name.


Too much arrogance in the Big 10 and SEC to change their names.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron