You are saying a city that has consistently lost population for 70 years at a rate of something like 200K+ per decade is somehow doing good now because it has seen a couple years of not losing population.
My point has been that there is no other city that I know of that has seen that kind of decline, none.
And the reason it is so bad is because of that decline. The reason there is so much abandoned space is because of this decline. The struggle to maintain these areas and services is because of this decline.
The reason for this decline for 70+ years is not strictly "White Flight". It may be a factor, and may have been a larger factor in some of those decades but not the entire issue. It is not the issue for the last several decades, at least not the main one, as for the last decade+ more Black people have left than White.
You have been saying the problem is the city has too much land for the population, well of course it does, but that is not the reason those spaces are abandoned, those spaces were abandoned causing the extra space. You cant go from 2m to 500K and not have a ton of abandoned space.
But again, give me one city that has seen the kind of decline over the last century that Detroit has. Give me 1 city that has as much abandoned property as Detroit. Again that abandoned property is because of the decline, not what caused the decline.
I get what you are saying it has a decent downtown, but outside of those few blocks it is a cesspool.
St Louis is a dump too, but it has some nicer parts, too, but overall its not good, but you will not find anything close to the amount of abandoned property there (or really anywhere) as you do in Detroit. But as you say Detroit has possibly leveled off, well I hope so, if it doesnt soon it will be a ghost town, losing 200K per decade is not sustainable and would almost certainly have to level off at some point.
Since 2019:
View attachment 132203
View attachment 132204