Is take Oakland's rotation over Detroit's, but Id much rather have Detroit's offense.
Is take Oakland's rotation over Detroit's, but Id much rather have Detroit's offense.
So you'll a rotation where none of the top 4 have an ERA under 3 over a team where their top 4 all have an ERA under. 3? That's probably a good indicator of why you never win in fantasy baseball as well.I'd take Detroit's rotation any day over Oakland's. Along with just about any baseball analyst that isn't a closet A's fan.
So you'll a rotation where none of the top 4 have an ERA under 3 over a team where their top 4 all have an ERA under. 3? That's probably a good indicator of why you never win in fantasy baseball as well.
Yea I kind of c[FONT=&]h[/FONT]uckle at everyone [FONT=&]h[/FONT]andin[FONT=&]g[/FONT] t[FONT=&]h[/FONT]e AL pennant to Detroit because of t[FONT=&]h[/FONT]e Price trade. W[FONT=&]h[/FONT]at [FONT=&]h[/FONT]as Price proven in t[FONT=&]h[/FONT]e postseason as a starter? Verlander [FONT=&]h[/FONT]as been avera[FONT=&]g[/FONT]e at best t[FONT=&]h[/FONT]is year and will take a rotation spot from eit[FONT=&]h[/FONT]er Sanc[FONT=&]h[/FONT]ez or Porcello in t[FONT=&]h[/FONT]e playoffs. [FONT=&]h[/FONT]ow about t[FONT=&]h[/FONT]e bullpen...t[FONT=&]h[/FONT]ey completely blew t[FONT=&]h[/FONT]e ALCS last year. Detroit is a damn [FONT=&]g[/FONT]ood team but slow down on sayin[FONT=&]g[/FONT] t[FONT=&]h[/FONT]ey're a runaway favorite.
All t[FONT=&]h[/FONT]is talk of Detroit and Oakland...I'd lau[FONT=&]g[/FONT][FONT=&]h[/FONT] if Ana[FONT=&]h[/FONT]eim ended up winnin[FONT=&]g[/FONT] t[FONT=&]h[/FONT]e pennant
You didn't listen to anything I said earlier. Four of those seven games against the A's this year, the Tigers faced a pitcher who won't be on the A's starting rotation in October. That really skews that 2-5 record that you're so insistent upon.I didn't realize fantasy baseball had anything to do with the Tigers owning the A's...
Coming from a fan of neither one of these teams, I will take the rotation with the last 3 AL Cy Young award winners.
Although, I will be cheering for the A's to win the WS if the Cards dont.
You know what this reminds me of? All the Twins fans year after year saying that this was the year because their numbers were better and they acquired better players at the deadline, and every year they got owned by the Yankees.
In the 2010s substitute the A's and Tigers.
A's fans can run their mouths all they want, but bottom line is they've won nothing, especially from the Tigers, and until your team actually does your words are empty. Everyone else in baseball might be afraid of the A's, but that doesn't include anyone in Detroit because the A's have no recent history of beating the Tigers. So yeah, go ahead and talk. The Tigers will just continue beating the A's.
I don't think that's a fair comparison at all. Those 2000s Twins teams got absolutely destroyed by the Yankees (winning just 2 games to the Yankees' 12 while barely scoring half the runs they gave up).
The Oakland/Detroit series has actually been pretty competitive, with each series going to game 5 and just 8 runs separating the two teams (only one game could be considered a blowout). I still put my money on Detroit because I think they'll have favorable pitching matchups, but it's not like Oakland has been or will be a pushover.
Please explain why you think this. I'm not saying you're wrong, just want to know why you think this when Detroit has one of the worst ERA's in the AL versus the 2nd best ERA in the majors. Last year I wouldn't even argue with you about which rotation is better (clearly it was Detroit last year), but they lost Fister, Verlander is awful, and Detroit has just a terrible bullpen.
Coming from an A's fan of 20ish years, until they win in the postseason, I do not care what ChOakland does in the regular season.
The A's lost their first home series since May to KC over the weekend. Might as well get a slump out of the way now, so they're firing at 100% by September and can claim their 3rd straight AL West title.