I actually don't think Iowa would put a fight about this.
Yeah, I don't either, and even if they did have reservations, I think the pressure coming to them from above would be more than enough to decide the issue.
I actually don't think Iowa would put a fight about this.
Yeah, I'm not spending time and money on an ISU program that's in the MAC...and I'm not alone. ISU athletics is dead w/o P5/P4 status. There is no relegation, only death. That said, I'm optimistic about our prospects at this moment...I think our "floor" is something like a "Super-American" conference.
Which minds you bites pretty hard, but it isn't the MAC.
But still a disaster.
I have no idea why Iowa would put up a fight about that.
A. It would simplify scheduling greatly for both teams, they’d play Thanksgiving Friday. **** Nebraska. And have a free non con slot for a top intersectional game every year.
B. Unlike with Mizzoo and A&M regarding OU and UT, we’re already on the schedule, and they’re arrogant enough to think they’d beat us most of the time anyway.
Politicians would force them to advocate for us. It’s a money and electability thing.
As stressful as this is, imagine the Fuskers if ISU joins the BIG...knocked another notch down on the peeking order and even less recruiting leverage. I can picture Nebby wanting KU long before ISU...Yeah, I don't either, and even if they did have reservations, I think the pressure coming to them from above would be more than enough to decide the issue.
That’s just flat out not true on every level. Voters from both parties span both fanbases. The actual politicians that matter are Reynolds and Whitver who are both Iowa State people. That’s all aside from the fact that Iowa State not getting into something would be devastating financially for the state.The politicians that care about sports are Iowa fans and their voters don't care about ISU. I suppose the Governor could try to lobby on ISU's behalf, but I think she's looking at bigger role in politics.
OK State is going to be the school that inevitably saves/kills the Big 12. The OK legislature could raise a stink that makes OU stay or they work out a solution to keep OK State fans/voters appeased.
The distance thing isn't a huge impediment...Ames to Seattle is 1,449 miles. For reference, the longest distance in the SEC is A&M to South Carolina (1,009 miles). Honestly...given air travel, 1,000 or 1,500 miles is pretty much the same. Plus, like you said, the PAC gets the desired midwest start times. I do like the potential Eastern division...I personally think the floor is a new look Pac 16. They have a lot of motivation to add midwestern schools to get into the central time zone. You add Kansas State, ISU, OSU, and Texas Tech you have guaranteed central time zone kickoff/tip off slots every week. They would literally have 12 hours worth of football time slots every weekend.
I know things are stressful at the moment but let's not lose our minds. A&M isn't leaving the SEC.
There’s absolutely zero chance we land in the BIG. Zero.
That’s just flat out not true on every level. Voters from both parties span both fanbases. The actual politicians that matter are Reynolds and Whitver who are both Iowa State people. That’s all aside from the fact that Iowa State not getting into something would be devastating financially for the state.
Exactly. Add to that the renegotiation of Texas contract well in advance of its expiration, the substantial losses by ESPN and the Disney parks, and I see your comment as more reason for now than anything else.I'm actually wondering if ESPN is the one who is driving this. Last year I had a conversation with a client who does business with Nike, which like ESPN makes a lot of money off of college sports. Their view is they always want the blue bloods to be winning and playing each other because that's what drives sales of merchandise, because of their bigger fanbases. So I would guess that ESPN has done the math and figured that they make a lot more money through subscriptions and ad revenue if Texas and OU are playing Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Auburn, LSU, A&M, etc., rather than K State, ISU, OSU, Baylor, etc. Then they can get those smaller schools relegated to a G5 conference and pay them a relative pittance for their TV rights.
I think this is one way to view it, and it might be how the media companies view it, but I f the blue bloods are always playing each other in the regular season, in the same conference,I'm actually wondering if ESPN is the one who is driving this. Last year I had a conversation with a client who does business with Nike, which like ESPN makes a lot of money off of college sports. Their view is they always want the blue bloods to be winning and playing each other because that's what drives sales of merchandise, because of their bigger fanbases. So I would guess that ESPN has done the math and figured that they make a lot more money through subscriptions and ad revenue if Texas and OU are playing Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Auburn, LSU, A&M, etc., rather than K State, ISU, OSU, Baylor, etc. Then they can get those smaller schools relegated to a G5 conference and pay them a relative pittance for their TV rights.
I actually like 4 team pods in a PAC 16.The distance thing isn't a huge impediment...Ames to Seattle is 1,449 miles. For reference, the longest distance in the SEC is A&M to South Carolina (1,009 miles). Honestly...given air travel, 1,000 or 1,500 miles is pretty much the same. Plus, like you said, the PAC gets the desired midwest start times. I do like the potential Eastern division...
Arizona
Arizona State
Utah
Colorado
ISU
OSU
KSU
TTech
PAC isn't taking the religious schools. KU more likely to the BIG. You could also throw ISU to the BIG and then the PAC pulls in another school.
I actually like 4 team pods in a PAC 16.
Midwest Pod: Iowa State, K-State, Oklahoma State, and Colorado
Southeast Pod: Texas Tech, Arizona, Arizona State, and Utah
California Pod: Cal, USC, UCLA, Stanford
Northwest Pod: Washington, Washington State, Oregon, Oregon State
This is by far the best case scenario.I actually like 4 team pods in a PAC 16.
Midwest Pod: Iowa State, K-State, Oklahoma State, and Colorado
Southeast Pod: Texas Tech, Arizona, Arizona State, and Utah
California Pod: Cal, USC, UCLA, Stanford
Northwest Pod: Washington, Washington State, Oregon, Oregon State
I actually like 4 team pods in a PAC 16.
Midwest Pod: Iowa State, K-State, Oklahoma State, and Colorado
Southeast Pod: Texas Tech, Arizona, Arizona State, and Utah
California Pod: Cal, USC, UCLA, Stanford
Northwest Pod: Washington, Washington State, Oregon, Oregon State
This is by far the best case scenario.