Not if we lose someone else it isn't. Kane is about the equivalent of Bubu or Naz Long IMO. So if we lost one of those two it would be about a wash bringing him in. I know people will say I'm crazy to think that Bubu or Naz are as good as Kane, but they very well could be. What would Bubu or Naz do in the MAC Conference. Probably tear it up pretty good.
And other scholarship players on our team, if they were to not be here, would be a net loss IMO with the addition of Kane. And no, I'm not saying Kane isn't a good player that I'm glad we got, I'm just comparing him to others on scholarship.
Losing a Matt Thomas, Monte Morris, or SDW would be a MUCH bigger net loss IMO, just to the fact that these 3 have 4 years of eligibility remaining and look to have very bright futures. Niang and Ejim aren't even in the debate whatsoever. Losing either of those two would be catastrophic.
And according to Fred himself, all 4 JUCO's are going to be here. So we know it's none of them.
All I'm saying is that the addition of Kane is awesome, as long as we aren't losing anyone else. If we are losing someone else, I could possibly be a net loss, or at best a wash IMO.
All that I needed to do was to go back and check the box scores of the 3 games that he played as a soph against LE's Southern Mississippi Golden Eagles team.In his career he averages 15.1 points a game, 4.4 rebounds and 7 assists.
In 7 career games against Memphis (not your typical conference usa team) he averages 17.2 pts, 5.3 rebounds and 3 assists.
Not if we lose someone else it isn't. Kane is about the equivalent of Bubu or Naz Long IMO. So if we lost one of those two it would be about a wash bringing him in. I know people will say I'm crazy to think that Bubu or Naz are as good as Kane, but they very well could be.
Not if we lose someone else it isn't. Kane is about the equivalent of Bubu or Naz Long IMO. So if we lost one of those two it would be about a wash bringing him in. I know people will say I'm crazy to think that Bubu or Naz are as good as Kane, but they very well could be. What would Bubu or Naz do in the MAC Conference. Probably tear it up pretty good.
And other scholarship players on our team, if they were to not be here, would be a net loss IMO with the addition of Kane. And no, I'm not saying Kane isn't a good player that I'm glad we got, I'm just comparing him to others on scholarship.
Losing a Matt Thomas, Monte Morris, or SDW would be a MUCH bigger net loss IMO, just to the fact that these 3 have 4 years of eligibility remaining and look to have very bright futures. Niang and Ejim aren't even in the debate whatsoever. Losing either of those two would be catastrophic.
And according to Fred himself, all 4 JUCO's are going to be here. So we know it's none of them.
All I'm saying is that the addition of Kane is awesome, as long as we aren't losing anyone else. If we are losing someone else, I could possibly be a net loss, or at best a wash IMO.
Yup. A coaches job is to always try to recruit over the existing talent. If Fred can get a guy that would start over Ejim, Niang, etc - he would.This is so dumb it's sig worthy. If he wasn't better than bubu or naz the staff wouldn't waste the time recruiting him.
Everyone makes a bad post once in a while. The difference is that when most of us find ourselves in hole we stop digging.
I'm sure Kane is a good player, and I'm glad he's here no matter what the situation is. I've already said that over and over again. I always trust Fred.
And to be clear, I've NEVER said that I didn't think Kane wasn't a good player either. Whether or not someone else is leaving doesn't change my mind whatsoever on bringing in Kane. It's a great idea to bring him in no matter what the case. As I've said, if someone's leaving, he helps fill a void. If not, it's even better. So it's good no matter what.
All I've ever said is that I can't make a judgment on whether or not adding him will upgrade the talent level on this team if I don't know if we're losing someone else or not? Adding Kane and losing SDW for instance is not necessarily an upgrade IMO. That's all.
Didnt this guy dispatch WVU last year? They are in the big 12, so that would qualify as "big 12 competition." Results were similar for his games against other high major teams. The guy can play.
Thanks for stopping byHey, guys -- congrats on a strong off-season, capped off with the signing of Kane. You'll be tough this year, and I can't wait to play you again with a very different WVU team that will hopefully be more up to the challenge. We'll see how our recruits pan out.
Not sure I'd go so far as to say Kane dispatched us, though. We did beat them by 10 after all (which is nothing to brag about, I admit). I do think he's a good pick-up for you though.
Good luck, and we'll see you when the season rolls around!
Hey, guys -- congrats on a strong off-season, capped off with the signing of Kane. You'll be tough this year, and I can't wait to play you again with a very different WVU team that will hopefully be more up to the challenge. We'll see how our recruits pan out.
Not sure I'd go so far as to say Kane dispatched us, though. We did beat them by 10 after all (which is nothing to brag about, I admit). I do think he's a good pick-up for you though.
Good luck, and we'll see you when the season rolls around!