"I think his point is that the argument is that this is going to be privately funded, but he's just asking if that's totally true (in terms of location, insurance, 401K, etc., etc., etc.). It's not a valid argument in less it's true.I think his point is that the argument is that this is going to be privately funded, but he's just asking if that's totally true (in terms of location, insurance, 401K, etc., etc., etc.). It's not a valid argument in less it's true."
It is all "what if"s".....no one has really a good arguement agianst...so they are creating some on the fly. Everyone loves Brett Meyer....he could do no wrong in the past, but now some people see he is for the Chaplain, and everyone is like "Oh, man Brett does not know what he is talking about."
Privatley funded means exactley that. He will not be an emplyee of ISU. I doubt he will have an on campus office, but will be no stranger there. Even if he does. and ISU rents it to him.....STILL DOES NOT COST TAX PAYER MONEY....that is what rent is for. Now, you are injecting the possibility of 401k....insurance...unbelieveable. Why wold ISU provide 401k or insurance to an FCA employee? Man, what will everyone that is agianst the Chaplain's imagination stir up next?