ESPN SEC spin has begun

AlaCyclone

Well-Known Member
Jun 14, 2007
5,604
6,799
113
Let's also forget that Bama almost lost to a bad South Carolina team at home and USF at home was a one point game going into the 4th quarter. It's not one fluke game, Bama has been good for about 3 halves this year and pretty average the rest of the season.
This Alabama team sucks balls (at least defensively) and will be fortunate to play and beat Indiana in the Citrus Bowl.
 

Cychl82

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 10, 2009
6,056
4,986
113
This Alabama team sucks balls (at least defensively) and will be fortunate to play and beat Indiana in the Citrus Bowl.
Truth, I completely forgo USF took them into deep waters even.
 

Cychl82

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 10, 2009
6,056
4,986
113
There is a reason they each want four guaranteed spots in the playoff.
Even if their non con is 3 crap games, 3 losses to the only ranked team they play too. Ole miss or mizzou is that perfect example
 

cydnote

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2023
654
1,327
93
Conference champions do not host a playoff game.

Penn State vs Alabama in Happy Valley is the correct answer here. The white out will be more effective with snow.
Oh I believe we're in, just thinking if we don't win the conference it could end up as a scenario for an at large.
 

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
26,980
41,724
113
Waukee
I don't think saying nice things about a Vanderbilt team that has improved from its normal "total doormat" status is necessarily meant to pump up Alabama. Let's give Vandy some due.

The bracket if you go purely on FPI right now assuming the highest-ranked team wins their conference...

1 = Texas (SEC champion)
8/9 = Notre Dame (at-large) / Tennessee (at-large) (South Bend, IN)

4 = Iowa St. (Big 12 champion)
5/12 = Alabama (at-large) / Boise St. (highest G5) (Tuscaloosa, AL)

2 = Ohio St. (Big Ten champion)
7/10 = Ole Miss (at-large) / Oregon (at-large) (Oxford, MS)

3 = Clemson (ACC champion)
6/11 = Georgia (at-large) / Penn St. (at-large) (Athens, GA)

5 SEC
3 Big Ten
1 monied independent
1 ACC
1 Big 12
1 MWC
= 12

They don't need to talk Vandy up to do something like this here.

We might as well get ready for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigCyFan

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,939
25,080
113
I don't think saying nice things about a Vanderbilt team that has improved from its normal "total doormat" status is necessarily meant to pump up Alabama. Let's give Vandy some due.

The bracket if you go purely on FPI right now assuming the highest-ranked team wins their conference...

1 = Texas (SEC champion)
8/9 = Notre Dame (at-large) / Tennessee (at-large) (South Bend, IN)

4 = Iowa St. (Big 12 champion)
5/12 = Alabama (at-large) / Boise St. (highest G5) (Tuscaloosa, AL)

2 = Ohio St. (Big Ten champion)
7/10 = Ole Miss (at-large) / Oregon (at-large) (Oxford, MS)

3 = Clemson (ACC champion)
6/11 = Georgia (at-large) / Penn St. (at-large) (Athens, GA)

5 SEC
3 Big Ten
1 monied independent
1 ACC
1 Big 12
1 MWC
= 12

They don't need to talk Vandy up to do something like this here.

We might as well get ready for it.

The SEC will get down to 4 once they start playing each other more. Bama, Georgia, Tennessee and Mississippi will all have at least one or two more losses. I’d guess we’ll see 2 from the ACC as a result. Unless ISU and BYU run the table to the CCG. Then there’s a chance for both to make it.
 

Nolaeer

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2012
790
963
93
i really think kstate is the only team with a realistic shot at beating you guys--unless the injuries get worse. Injuries to key people can derail any team, especially at qb.

I also believe if ISU and WVU traded coaching staffs, WVU would have won that game. Isnt it funny that WVU cant even snap the ball against PSU and ISU, and has no issues snapping it against kansas, albany, or oklahoma state? NB pisses his pants when the lights are bright, and the team reflects nervousness.
 

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
98,858
62,435
113
55
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com

The fingers are on the scales. Rank a bunch of teams higher than they merit, and then when they lose, promote the teams that beat them into the ranks. Makes it hard for them to not have a bunch of ranked teams at the end of the year.
 
Last edited:

ISUCyclones2015

Doesn't wipe standing up
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 19, 2010
14,663
10,963
113
Chicago, IL
I love the "not the same team we were in game x" excuse.

If only we could all pick and choose only those games in which we were good.
I do think teams change throughout the season and “wake up” games are a thing IMO (especially with Iowa State in recent memory, like the Louisiana or Ohio games). Also the flip side, you could have a bunch of injuries, a scandal, or something causing the team to do worse.

Thats why I am a big believer when discussing ranked wins, is have it be ranking at time of the game AND current.

But I agree with your second point, you can’t just pick and choose the narrative when convenient
 

PSYclone22

Visual Analytics Mercenary
SuperFanatic
Aug 15, 2012
5,103
3,211
113
Des Moines
It's ok, everyone. Vanderbilt has looked good the last few games. That's good for us. The more that the bottom SEC teams can find wins against top teams, the harder they'll have to work to make a "well, 9-3 Bama should be in over 12-1 Big 12 runner up" argument.
 

Cyclonsin

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 4, 2020
2,394
4,954
113
36
Savannah, GA
It's ok, everyone. Vanderbilt has looked good the last few games. That's good for us. The more that the bottom SEC teams can find wins against top teams, the harder they'll have to work to make a "well, 9-3 Bama should be in over 12-1 Big 12 runner up" argument.
I think you're exactly the opposite of correct on this. The better the bottom half of the SEC looks, the easier it is to justify letting 3-loss SEC teams in.