I dont think he should be fired. I just hope hes learned from it and betters his future articles because of it.
His main sources are disgruntled ex coaches, pretty irresponsible journalism.
I could tell just by reading the story that it was BS and his sources were either boosters or former coaches that were mad because Fred bolted. Rookie journalism if you ask me.
and that negates them how exactly? if i were a reporter, i'd listen to ex coaches disgruntled or not...they would have zero to lose in speaking to a reporter under anonymity.
just too bad jamie and fred didn't want to comment on the record in the article.
worst thread name ever, Hines is a great reporter, Pollard is not a great AD
Jamie said on M&A that Hines contacted Steve Malchow on Monday and wanted to talk to Jamie on Wednesday about a story coming out on Wednesday. Jamie declined since it felt to him the story was written already and wasn't going to change no matter what he said.
Did he seriously say that? That's a horrible...HORRIBLE response on Pollard's part. He has his chance, and just threw is arms up and said 'welp, it's already written so whatever...'. That is stupidity on his part for not finding out what was said and putting his thoughts into the story.
Did he seriously say that? That's a horrible...HORRIBLE response on Pollard's part. He has his chance, and just threw is arms up and said 'welp, it's already written so whatever...'. That is stupidity on his part for not finding out what was said and putting his thoughts into the story.
Did he seriously say that? That's a horrible...HORRIBLE response on Pollard's part. He has his chance, and just threw is arms up and said 'welp, it's already written so whatever...'. That is stupidity on his part for not finding out what was said and putting his thoughts into the story.
Because the editor is his drinking buddy, Bobby LaGesse, and they just exponentially grew their views with one article. Hines is a good reporter, but this was his audition for a bigger and better publication, facts be damned. I don't mind the story. I hate how he framed the story.
This is literally the most defeatist first grade level logic I can think of.Jamie said on M&A that Hines contacted Steve Malchow on Monday and wanted to talk to Jamie on Wednesday about a story coming out on Wednesday. Jamie declined since it felt to him the story was written already and wasn't going to change no matter what he said.
Pollard is fighting to protect his job, Hines will be fine regardless, in this type of story you just can't release sources. But go ahead and support Pollard. Fred will support his boss regardless. Pollard does seem kind of stingy to me, Hilton does have green Pioneer logos at mid-court and that looks REAL NICE. Why would Fred interview at Minnesota when he has his dream job here at ISU? Maybe because he was undervalued and UNDERPAID??? You offer the mayor whatever he wants. I'm not saying Hines is great in this article but the man brought up some reason as to why the mayor left town, which the move surprised most all of us. You don't just leave Georges , Naz, and the rest of the team for NBA money, something had to have happened, and Hines wrote a story and what could have gone down. I don't question Hines integrity, what other story has he published that has been misleading?? Travis is a fine reporter and I will take his side on this issue.