How to "start over"?

DaddyMac

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2006
14,070
453
83
There are certainly successes - and failures - from both types of backgrounds. I was objecting to you writing off mid-major HC's from our candidates list. I'm not writing off all assistants (as you are writing off all mid-major head coaches), just saying the body of work is not as strong, and it's a bigger risk.

I'm "writing off all mid majors"? Damn - forgot to tell myself that. :skeptical:

I'm not "writing off" anyone. Pointed out a pretty obvious fact. Our track record with mid-majors isn't the best. While we're at it, I haven't "written off" GMac - as you have.

Why again is their "body of work" always not as strong and they're always a bigger risk?

(see, I can generalize across an entire group on your behalf too)
 
Last edited:

cyclonenum1

Well-Known Member
Nov 30, 2006
7,191
330
83
I preface by stating (what you already may know by my prior posts) that I "blindly support" whoever is a Cyclone. I can live with the worst but always hope for the best when it comes to our teams. I don't expect everyone to agree with me or treat being a fan the same way I do.

All I know... is that now, more than ever... there are people calling for a coaching change in men's basketball. Though I don't agree with it, I can see that it's not necessarily a vocal minority anymore... but a significant number of people who take issue with our coach.

My question... is how do we start over and not be in the same scenario we are in now? A When I think "new coach" I think... more turnover... we lose a lot of the incoming recruits that we've got... we lose some of our underclassmen potentially... we start from scratch like Mac did. B I fear one of Mac's mistakes may have been trying to salvage and getting "what he could" from the Juco ranks and trying to put together decent results too soon.

Maybe (though unfair to the likes of Rahshon Clark) he would have done better taking advantage of the mass exodus and trying to assemble a dream team the following year with the promise of starting a bunch of elite freshmen that commit together? I dunno... probably wouldn't work... but who knows.

Anyway... to the questions:

1. How do we change coaches without starting from scratch?

2. If we do start from scratch... given how our fans have been in waiting for too long for results as is... would our fans have enough patience left to wait "another 4 years" for results?

3. Any other thoughts on how to handle a coaching change?

A - Why do you assume mass turnover of recruits and existing players. If we hire the right guy he will a) know how important it is to retain the quality recruits and players and b) be a guy that these guys will want to play for.

B - This comment absolutely baffles me..."trying to put togther decent results too soon"? What in the world are you talking about? We are in year four...that is a long time in the world of CBB. And it seems that McDermott is increasingly relying on JUCO guys the longer he has been at ISU...is that the what you expected?

1) Hire the right guy that can win over the players and recruits...a guy that they want to play for.

2) You don't need to wait another four years...turnarounds in CBB can happen pretty fast with the right coach.

3) I think you ask our existing coach to step aside on his own...if he is such a great guy he will agree to help us out. Failing that, you negotiate down his buyout with him. You then go out and get a proven coach from a major team / conference...maybe one that feels underappreciated or one that wants to coach where the fans are passionate about basketball or one that is in a big city playing 4th, 5th, 6th fiddle to a bunch of pro teams.
 

cyclonenum1

Well-Known Member
Nov 30, 2006
7,191
330
83
I don't think we need to go into this with a particular "profile" in mind. After firing WM, we got too caught up in trying to find the mirror "opposite". Perhaps many were so thrilled when we found McD was because we succeeded in finding exactly what we were looking for - "discipline", "integrity" and Iowan.
I'd want to be careful this time in not building a specific profile. Alums aren't necessarily better than non-alumns. Engergizers are not necessarily better than non-energizers.
Go get someone who can win. Even if it's someone in the Huggy Bear category, we'll find a way to defend him if he wins here.

This happens often in transitions...you swing the pendulum from one far position to exact opposite far position.
 

ISUFan22

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
33,922
904
113
Denver, CO
Greg played at a non-BCS school. All the teams he's been a coach of have been non-BCS. ISU was his first BSC interaction (other than playing against BCS schools).

It's an excellent point that was eluded to earlier. I supported the hire and don't regret that, but the transition to "big-time" just has not worked for Greg.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WalkingCY

DRCHIRO

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 13, 2008
2,477
296
83
Greg played at a non-BCS school. All the teams he's been a coach of have been non-BCS. ISU was his first BSC interaction (other than playing against BCS schools).

It's an excellent point that was eluded to earlier. I supported the hire and don't regret that, but the transition to "big-time" just has not worked for Greg.

He seemed like a perfect fit. Iowa guy, took a mid major to the tournament on a few occasions and seemed genuine. Felt like a guy we were going to have around for a long time.

Like a lot of mid major coaches, he had some success at the right time and was able to jump ship for a higher paying job.

Hopefully he can find a way to right the ship but there have been no signs of that happening in the near (or distant) future.
 

cyclonenum1

Well-Known Member
Nov 30, 2006
7,191
330
83
Greg played at a non-BCS school. All the teams he's been a coach of have been non-BCS. ISU was his first BSC interaction (other than playing against BCS schools).

It's an excellent point that was eluded to earlier. I supported the hire and don't regret that, but the transition to "big-time" just has not worked for Greg.

Some can make the transition and some cannot. I think most of us believed he could when he was hired but the results have proven something different.
 

cyclone13

Well-Known Member
Apr 7, 2009
3,335
1,220
113
I don't know how things would shake out... but can we accept losing Colvin? Ejim? Phillips? Haley?

Will the fanbase be okay with that if that happened?

The fanbase must accept that this is the risk when a coach leaves or is let go.
This is the time also when JP will have to act when hiring new coach: "Here's my expectation. Here are our problems, I know it won't happen overnight, but I expect the fruit in (e.g) season 3 that we'll start having winning record. Meanwhile I expect that the team will be (1) clean from scandal and (2) play competitively. I expect support from you"

So JP has to set the standard and explain it to the fans, so fans understand.
 

WalkingCY

Well-Known Member
Sep 26, 2008
6,895
2,592
113
Kansas City
A - Why do you assume mass turnover of recruits and existing players. If we hire the right guy he will a) know how important it is to retain the quality recruits and players and b) be a guy that these guys will want to play for.

B - This comment absolutely baffles me..."trying to put togther decent results too soon"? What in the world are you talking about? We are in year four...that is a long time in the world of CBB. And it seems that McDermott is increasingly relying on JUCO guys the longer he has been at ISU...is that the what you expected?

1) Hire the right guy that can win over the players and recruits...a guy that they want to play for.

2) You don't need to wait another four years...turnarounds in CBB can happen pretty fast with the right coach.

3) I think you ask our existing coach to step aside on his own...if he is such a great guy he will agree to help us out. Failing that, you negotiate down his buyout with him. You then go out and get a proven coach from a major team / conference...maybe one that feels underappreciated or one that wants to coach where the fans are passionate about basketball or one that is in a big city playing 4th, 5th, 6th fiddle to a bunch of pro teams.


agree here. well said.
 

Al_4_State

Moderator
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 27, 2006
32,459
28,825
113
40
Driftless Region
Visit site
People can accept the results not being great if there are signs of improvement. There has been NO improvement under McDermott. Paul Rhoads didn't make excuses, and he took his team to the 2nd highest # of wins in my lifetime.
 

dbronco7sc

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2006
1,958
159
63
40
Brookings, SD
Visit site
A - Why do you assume mass turnover of recruits and existing players. If we hire the right guy he will a) know how important it is to retain the quality recruits and players and b) be a guy that these guys will want to play for.

B - This comment absolutely baffles me..."trying to put togther decent results too soon"? What in the world are you talking about? We are in year four...that is a long time in the world of CBB. And it seems that McDermott is increasingly relying on JUCO guys the longer he has been at ISU...is that the what you expected?

1) Hire the right guy that can win over the players and recruits...a guy that they want to play for.

2) You don't need to wait another four years...turnarounds in CBB can happen pretty fast with the right coach.

3) I think you ask our existing coach to step aside on his own...if he is such a great guy he will agree to help us out. Failing that, you negotiate down his buyout with him. You then go out and get a proven coach from a major team / conference...maybe one that feels underappreciated or one that wants to coach where the fans are passionate about basketball or one that is in a big city playing 4th, 5th, 6th fiddle to a bunch of pro teams.

A - I don't know or assume turnover will happen with certainty. If I had to bet... I would take the side of some turnover though with underclassmen or new recurits. And you're right... it's possible that we get somebody who can keep them. Though I feel it will be an undaunting task to obtain such a coach who would be able to accomplish this.

B - I think you mis-understood my original comment. I'm not talking about 4 years after he got here. I am talking about year 1. Instead of bringing in Taylor and McIntosh and the others that never made it here for more than 2 years... maybe risk a worse season than he had year 1 and try to bring in an all-star class for year 2 with the promise of playing time. Instead... each year we've been plagued by some turnover and we keep trying to salvage each of those seasons with the best available guys at that point. I am on the fence about this issue... My original comment meant... "Maybe we would have been better off sacrificing Year 1 for a great Year 2 class.. and have an okay year 3, great year 4 and so on." Does that make more sense?

I'm trying no to take a stance on the topic of this thread... just soak in everybody's thoughts.

I think you're right on point 2. I just am trying to figure out what everyone thinks is the best way to do it is.
 

CloneIce

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
37,772
21,151
113
I don't know how things would shake out... but can we accept losing Colvin? Ejim? Phillips? Haley?

Will the fanbase be okay with that if that happened?

Who is Haley?

Can certainly accept losing the recruits who are not on our roster yet. Based on Gmac's track record we will be lucky if 1 or more of the recruits is a good Big 12 player anyway.

The only two players in our program that I would be worried about losing are Colvin and Ham. SC and the guys who will be Srs next year aren't going anywhere else to play basketball.

Based on 4-years of player retention under Gmac, it does not appear we have many players on our roster who are here mainly because they love our coach or his system. I don't think we would see a mass exodus if we make a change (like we did when we hired Gmac).
 

CycloneWarning

Well-Known Member
Jan 14, 2008
3,520
860
83
Not entirely correct, you forgot the year based on Jiri driving the wrong car. The extension was based on:

1 year for losing 1 scholarship in year 1 to APR (wouldn't have been filled anyway).

1 year for losing an 2nd scholarship in year 1 to APR (")

1 year for Jiri sitting out 6 non-conference games for driving the wrong car (flat-out inexcusable).

= 9 year contract for a coach who had never coached a game at this level.... apparently 6 years wasn't enough time to rebuilding a basketball program (ridiculous I know).

Bottom line is that terrible contract extension has put our MBB program in a very bad situation now.

Exactly. I get so tired of people trying to say GMac deserves a NINE year contract over losing Jiri for 6 games, and not having two marginal scholarships to fill in year 1. It was simply a bone-headed move by JP to not distinguish between major violations and minor impacts. None of those issues could not have been overcome in an initial five year or six year contract term. Then you can extend based on actual performance, not automatic technicalities.

GMac and his agent are probably still chuckling to this day.:yes:
 

WalkingCY

Well-Known Member
Sep 26, 2008
6,895
2,592
113
Kansas City
How to start over? Get a good candidate(s) in mind for HC in 2010-11 right now: I think we could get this guy at a reasonable price:

Doug Wojcik

DougWojcik2009-300.JPG

If we are looking, I hope the AD is taking notice of this guy:


There have been great coaches that have led the Tulsa Golden Hurricane basketball program -- Nolan Richardson . . . Tubby Smith . . . Bill Self -- three coaches who took the Hurricane to new levels.
Richardson led Tulsa to the 1981 NIT Championship in his first year . . . Smith guided the Hurricane to the school's first-ever NCAA "Sweet Sixt een" appearance in 1994 . . . Self took Tulsa to just five points shy of an NCAA Final Four appearance in 2000. Enter . . . Doug Wojcik. In four seasons, Wojcik has taken a nine-win team and has posted three consecutive 20+ win seasons, back-to-back 25+ win campaigns, advanced to the championship game of the 2008 and 2009 Conference USA Tournament, won the inaugural College Basketball Invitational post-season event in his third season and advanced to the NIT second round in his fourth year.

Wojcik enters his fifth season in 2009-10 having compiled an overall 81-53 career record. With those 81 victories, he ranks sixth on the school's career coaching wins list, passing the likes of both Smith and Self.

read profile:
The University of Tulsa Official Athletic Site

Why I like him:

18-4, 7-1 (Currently 1st in Conf. USA) in Conference play this season. (Looking to be dancing) "Fiery" when he has to, and is already established here in the "midwest" which would keep us right in the areas on where we like to recruit. Reminds me of records LE had before leaving Utah State.
DW Comes from a list of "winners" that coached before him, but showing even better success than they had.....at this day and time. Pretty impressive. Could this guy be a Cyclone? Make a step up to the B12? I hope so.
 
Last edited:

Tornado man

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2007
11,913
-539
113
63
Ames, IA
Greg played at a non-BCS school. All the teams he's been a coach of have been non-BCS. ISU was his first BSC interaction (other than playing against BCS schools).

It's an excellent point that was alluded to earlier. I supported the hire and don't regret that, but the transition to "big-time" just has not worked for Greg.

Fixed it for you.

Good thing Pitt didn't hear about this "BCS" connection; they never would have hired Ben Howland from Norther Arizona. Howland had zero BCS connections.
Also, good thing South Carolina didn't hear about this "BCS" connection, or they wouldn't have hired Darrin Horn from West. Kentucky last year. Horn had zero BCS connections.
Neither coach came from the "big time."
 

ISUFan22

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
33,922
904
113
Denver, CO
Fixed it for you.

Good thing Pitt didn't hear about this "BCS" connection; they never would have hired Ben Howland from Norther Arizona. Howland had zero BCS connections.
Also, good thing South Carolina didn't hear about this "BCS" connection, or they wouldn't have hired Darrin Horn from West. Kentucky last year. Horn had zero BCS connections.
Neither coach came from the "big time."

Grammar police, yay!

Howland - played some pro ball overseas and was the assistant at Gonzaga while Stockton was there.
Horn - was an assistant under Crean at Marquette

No BCS connections but "better" experience than Greg has.