CycloneErik
Well-Known Member
18-2, with close losses to Indiana (69-65) and Michigan St. (62-59)
But if you want to think that Hilton is the only tough place to play at, knock yourself out.
Game is at Hilton.
18-2, with close losses to Indiana (69-65) and Michigan St. (62-59)
But if you want to think that Hilton is the only tough place to play at, knock yourself out.
Many thought that BEFORE they played ISU. You have to remember that while Michigan made the NCAA finals, they also finished 4th in the BIG.
18-2, with close losses to Indiana (69-65) and Michigan St. (62-59)
But if you want to think that Hilton is the only tough place to play at, knock yourself out.
18-2, with close losses to Indiana (69-65) and Michigan St. (62-59)
But if you want to think that Hilton is the only tough place to play at, knock yourself out.
AKA 0-2 vs ranked teams.
Hilton isn't the only tough place to play, BYU is pretty tough as well
Lets clarify here a bit. We are talking a #1 and #2 seed (not all ranked teams are equal). I'm sorry, but Michigan isn't a #1 or #2 seed this year. Most of the #1 or #2 seeds that come into Hilton walk away with a win as well (Kansas).
So to clarify Iowa went 0-2 vs ranked teams at home last year and ISU went 2-1.
No to clarify, Iowa went 0-2 at home against #1 and #2 NCAA seeds. ISU went 0-1 at home against #1 and #2 seeds. Not Iowa's fault ISU played a weak schedule.
39-16 At home in the Fran McCaffery Era
8 wins and 8 of those losses came in the first year with just a terrible team. Leaving 31-8 (.79) in the last three years.
Hoiberg:
13-6 year one at home
17-2 year two
17-1 year three
3-0 so far
50-9 total (.85)
Obviously Hilton is a better home court advantage, but lets not pretend like Carver is the easiest place to win in the world.
I'll give you credit there, that was pretty funny. You're right though, #22 Michigan State was playing real tough basketball when they beat Iowa in Historic Carver Arena.
Every SOS I've ever seen is figured by where they end up at the end of the year. Did they change that and start rating SOS from when you played opponents? If so, that is very odd indeed.
Obviously Hilton is a better home court advantage
Thought maybe a fellow Iowa fan could talk some sense into you
Haha touche. Just saying it's not that crazy to think you're going to win on the road when you just did it the last time you played there. Like I said, I don't expect ISU to win at BYU (a tough environment)...I don't think Carver has gotten the street credit yet to be a tough place to play.
Hilton isn't the only tough place to play, BYU is pretty tough as well
Plus, you have to remember what a piece of **** move he made when he came down to visit Fred. The bad part is that it was a meeting they requested.
Plus, he makes Kevin McHale look like Fabio. And a 7 footer that plays below the rim???
Where did I ever say that Iowa has a BETTER home court advantage? I said Hilton isn't the ONLY home court advantage....
I thought maybe a fellow ISU fan could talk some sense into you.
What did Woodberry do during his visit? I always see people say that he acted like a ****** but no one ever gives an explanation.
If we are taking off a terrible year for Iowa, let's do it for ISU too. 37-3 after year one, that makes .93 winning percentage, quite a bit better than .7939-16 At home in the Fran McCaffery Era
8 wins and 8 of those losses came in the first year with just a terrible team. Leaving 31-8 (.79) in the last three years.
Hoiberg:
13-6 year one at home
17-2 year two
17-1 year three
3-0 so far
50-9 total (.85)
Obviously Hilton is a better home court advantage, but lets not pretend like Carver is the easiest place to win in the world.
What did Woodberry do during his visit? I always see people say that he acted like a ****** but no one ever gives an explanation.