Agree.
I will also point out that one hawkeye fan that texted me about the yards, I didn't even bring it up, and tried to defend it. He said that due to turnovers with short fields, that Iowa didn't get the opportunity to get yards. My question was, why didnt you score 4-5 touchdowns then and settle for punts and field goals so much. If it wasn't for the turnovers, they would have had the same yards and less points.
The defense was great. Even with the short field situations that they had to deal with they shut down Iowa early on with some 3 and outs and short drives. Iowa's scoring drives:
2nd quarter:
8 plays 49 yards 4 yard TD run
10 plays 71 yards 26 yd TD pass
3rd quarter:
6 yard fumble return when Breece coughed it up
4 plays - 8 yards 51 yd FG kick
4th quarter:
6 plays 18 yards 22 yd FG
Other than the 2nd TD score in the 2nd quarter you can blame most of that on bad field position due to our offense turning it over or punt team not flipping the field like Iowa was doing whenever they punted.
Iowa ran 20 less plays than us while having the edge on time of possession 31:38 to 28:22. We held Iowa to just 1.7 yards per rush and 5.0 yards per pass which I would take those kinds of averages any game. Bottom line is our 4 turnovers and giving Iowa a short field to work with often was the difference. Iowa has an elite punter and it put us in a position to have to drive a long field many times but Iowa basically had 1 big/long scoring drive on us the entire game and the defense did more than their part to keep us in that game other than forcing turnovers themselves which is going to happen some games this season with the talent and experience on that side of the ball.
This offense has sustained long drives the past couple of years with this core group of players so whatever is going on right now needs to be fixed quick as there is not much margin for error this season if they want to accomplish certain goals.