Just getting to watch the game now.
-Montgomery is a freaking stud.
...just saw his TD run, holy ****.
-Montgomery is a freaking stud.
...just saw his TD run, holy ****.
Last edited:
Watching OU v Buckeyes and the idea that Iowa is better on D than OU is laughable. Per play there is no way they are on the same level. This repeated idea that was the best D we'll play is silly. I wish it were true because ISU would be a big 12 contender.
Watching OU v Buckeyes and the idea that Iowa is better on D than OU is laughable. Per play there is no way they are on the same level. This repeated idea that was the best D we'll play is silly. I wish it were true because ISU would be a big 12 contender.
I think the team played well and it was called well. I just wish out D would have had a spy on some of those short out passes and jumped one for 6. Even TD in OT there should have been some one sneak out there after the snap and help out. The staff will learn and move one.
Who cares about reputation? ISU's reputation coming into this game was that the secondary was salty, but the front seven was weak. Yet at the end of the day, Iowa threw for 333 yards and only averaged 4.0 ypc on the ground (not a particularly strong number with a back like Wadley carrying the bulk of the load).
Iowa does have a few playmakers on offense (Wadley obviously being at the top of that list), and they've got an offensive coordinator who's far less predictable than his predecessor (they've been breaking a lot of KOK/Greg Davis tendencies this year so far). They do have some ability to actually stretch the field (Smith-Marsette has legit speed, and the tight ends are downfield threats, as well). Stanley missed on some big opportunities today, but he's also got a lot of potential (big arm, he showed much better pocket presence and poise today than week 1), and those opportunities were there because they finally have guys who can separate/create some mismatches.