It would still be a strong KU home court advantage. Their fans have been gobbling up tickets in Des Moines.How so? If the top seeds like KU are supposed to get earned advantage, how can you give them an 8/9 team basically playing at home???
It would still be a strong KU home court advantage. Their fans have been gobbling up tickets in Des Moines.How so? If the top seeds like KU are supposed to get earned advantage, how can you give them an 8/9 team basically playing at home???
I'd love for that to happenI’ve also been predicting Iowa vs WVU
Was going to do one of these but I don't want to ruin this thread.If it's allowed prior to midnight, did you consider titling thread:
***Official Selection Sunday Thread 2023***
--> Totally your decision, of course, but I anticipate similar thread themes will get started late tonight/tomorrow a.m.
No rule against itCan someone explain to me why Iowa could get Des Moines? Aren’t they around an 8 seed at this point? Kansas will have Des Moines I would think so they wouldn’t put an instate team against the top seed in the second round…
Can someone explain to me why Iowa could get Des Moines? Aren’t they around an 8 seed at this point? Kansas will have Des Moines I would think so they wouldn’t put an instate team against the top seed in the second round…
Lunardi has moved Iowa to Birmingham against USC.Can someone explain to me why Iowa could get Des Moines? Aren’t they around an 8 seed at this point? Kansas will have Des Moines I would think so they wouldn’t put an instate team against the top seed in the second round…
Don't see it happening for 2 reasons:It's a legitimate possibility unfortunately.
I bet LSU was thrilled about playing us in Milwaukee last year. Same with Wisconsin not having absolute home court advantage against us, either - and yet it still happened.
Just because the tournament committee places the top 16 seeds as close to their home as is logistically possible doesn't mean they won't put a lower seed in a near home court situation if it balances the brackets. Just the way it works.
This, they have the seeds pretty accurate but everything else (matchup, City, potential matchups on same bracket) is like throwing darts with a blindfold. When there’s a committee that uses the net rankings only as a reference and there are a ton of other variables they have to factor (finding proximity advantages for upper seeds, avoiding proximity advantages for lower seeds, avoiding potential conference matchups in the first weekend, the list goes on) these guys don’t have any idea where the committee will truly put anyone.Lunardi isn’t good at this.
- There are fewer elite mid-majors (effects of NIL?), although still a few but this group isn’t as deep on paper (fewer Q1 wins/big upsets in the non-con)
I hope they get sent to Birmingham but bracketing principles don't care about that second round matchup and honestly I don't think Iowa wins a game anyway. They're toilet paper sawft....Don't see it happening for 2 reasons:
1. Why would you reward a team that had a mediocre season who lost a ton of bad games with an essential home game?
2. Why would you punish the likely overall #1 seed Kansas with having to play a team it's back yard in round 2?
Classic Big 10 matchupLunardi has moved Iowa to Birmingham against USC.
Sell to KU fans later this evening. The T-shirt fans will pay through the roof to get whole session tickets and you’ll likely make a good profit. As we get closer to Thursday prices will probably come back to earth a bit after the initial buying surge.Since DSM is unlikely, hoping for a Friday game and some great DSM matchups on Thur/Sat since I have tickets.