How do we know that it was different than they expected?
It was known that he hit a woman and broke her jaw. How many different ways can that possibly look?
How do we know that it was different than they expected?
I'm just saying there is a clear physical advantage. That dude bench presses how much?
Would he not have had that same clear physical advantage on 90%+ of the student population. Definitely did not get punished sufficiently here, legally or by the university. I think the girl should also face assault charges. She did pay for her decision making by suffering a broken jaw and I'm sure she'll seek civil compensation. Her actions in my opinion, constitute assault. Just because you are weaker or a women doesn't mean you should be allowed to act as she did. His response was not proportional but a response was justified.
I'm probably 40% as strong as Mixon, that woman is probably 25% as strong.
Is it OK for me to go up to a black guy, call them the N word, and hit him? I mean of course that would make me a racist idiot, but is that fine? We can all just walk around hurling the N word and hitting people as long as we're physically weaker?
I'm totally fine with Mixon being punished for this and think he should be, but his punishment should be comparable or less than the person who started the altercation with racial slurs and violence. As I said before, I've gone my entire life without hurling racial slurs and attacking people in public, it's an incredibly easy thing to do and those who somehow can't need to be punished and reformed.
Well supposedly Mixon was harassing her gay friend outside, why was he dumb enough to come in and restart the incident. I certainly wasn't there and don't know everything but coming in to reinstigate the confrontation seems to be exhibiting poor judgment. Once he makes the pros this behavior will cost him millions.
HFCS replied to this before reading the posts where you and GTO hashed it out, did not mean for this to seem like piling on.
Well supposedly Mixon was harassing her gay friend outside, why was he dumb enough to come in and restart the incident. I certainly wasn't there and don't know everything but coming in to reinstigate the confrontation seems to be exhibiting poor judgment. Once he makes the pros this behavior will cost him millions.
HFCS replied to this before reading the posts where you and GTO hashed it out, did not mean for this to seem like piling on.
It's OK, I was a moron and was talking about things without all the info. There are situations like I was talking about where people act irrationally like women are too weak and stupid to be responsible for their actions but this really doesn't look like one of them the more I learn. Listen first then talk, I should have known.
Legally sure he can file an assualt charge. But at what point does a man stronger than 98% of humanity juat turn and walk away instead of hitting a woman in the face? The law and what's right aren't always the same thing.
where did i say that?Her being able to hit people with no consequences is whats right?
Two and a half years ago, thought we had a significant penalty, a strong penalty," Stoops said Wednesday. "Now, it isn't enough. These individuals can't have a second chance. Just not acceptable.
Of course Bob would give him a tougher penalty today, he's not on the team so it doesn't matterhttp://www.espn.com/college-footbal...rs-says-joe-mixon-suspension-not-enough-today
Remember 2 years ago when it was ok to punch women? Bob does.
Of course Bob would give him a tougher penalty today, he's not on the team so it doesn't matter
Well I'm an idiot, I'll leave it up. I assumed he was no longer on the team, which is why Stoops was saying he would have punished him more instead of just doing so. So considering I haven't really been following this, what's stopping him from kicking him off the team now, except that he wants to keep his star player? Or do you think he will kick him off the team now?Mixon is their star player....
Well I'm an idiot, I'll leave it up. I assumed he was no longer on the team, which is why Stoops was saying he would have punished him more instead of just doing so. So considering I haven't really been following this, what's stopping him from kicking him off the team now, except that he wants to keep his star player? Or do you think he will kick him off the team now?
This is gone a little weird to me, there is nothing someone says to someone that justifies violence. The slapping was out of line no matter what was said. And cold clocking someone for a slap was also out of line.I apologize as it seems I only got half the story. I still don't disagree with the stance that someone who starts a physical altercation while hurling racial slurs shouldn't be held accountable for whatever comes of it even if they're much physically weaker or a woman...but it sounds entirely possible that wasn't the case as I heard it was on ESPN.
My guess is instead of kicking him off the team Mixon will declare for the draft and decide he should sit out the bowl game to prepare for the draft. Of course I am real curious where he would go in the draft. I would think the NFL would want some distance between themselves and yet another violence against women issue.Well I'm an idiot, I'll leave it up. I assumed he was no longer on the team, which is why Stoops was saying he would have punished him more instead of just doing so. So considering I haven't really been following this, what's stopping him from kicking him off the team now, except that he wants to keep his star player? Or do you think he will kick him off the team now?
My guess is instead of kicking him off the team Mixon will declare for the draft and decide he should sit out the bowl game to prepare for the draft. Of course I am real curious where he would go in the draft. I would think the NFL would want some distance between themselves and yet another violence against women issue.
Nope and I have no idea who that isI trust you're not a Chiefs fan.
![]()
Nope and I have no idea who that is