I actually think this has been a big deal because it has been the first chance for the Anit-Mac Coalition to get to his character. They are taking that chance and running with it.
I actually think this has been a big deal because it has been the first chance for the Anit-Mac Coalition to get to his character. They are taking that chance and running with it.
See, I don't think you listened to Mac---you're just reading the paper.
3. He asked the players their input, but the decision wasn't made based on what they said, but he used that to make his decision. I don't get the idea that it was a 'tell me what I should do, I'll do what ever you want' type of conversation. I get the impression that it was more of a discussion with the players.
No, I heard the audio of his interview when he said, "when Craig Brackins looks at you and says 'coach, you have no choice.' That's when I knew had to play him."
That doesn't sound like any "discussion" to me, unless you don't believe Mac...
No, I heard the audio of his interview when he said, "when Craig Brackins looks at you and says 'coach, you have no choice.' That's when I knew had to play him."
That doesn't sound like any "discussion" to me, unless you don't believe Mac...
Do you really believe that's all that was said?
Brackins(walks in): Hey Mac, you have no choice
Mac: Okay
Brackins(walks out): See you at the game.
Come on...
Mac's mistake was setting a deadline. But by setting the deadline and breaking it we can end the "Mac is above other coaches thing." He's just like all the others. When the going really gets tough he does what he feels will give him the best chance to win. And that is actually what you pay him to do.
No, but I think it's telling that Mac would even include it as a way to justify playing Colvin. Why do it, unless it's to spread the responsibility of the decision.
Oh, I don't know, maybe because it was the truth...
Hey Mac, we're going to question your integrity anyway...You might as well lie to us.![]()
I understand what you are saying. But let me ask this then......what else is okay? Should we bring Pomlee back? Should we cheat with recruiting? Should we get the boosters to pay the players somehow?
GMac compromised his integrity and most on here are apparently okay with it because he was just trying to win......something that he specifically said would make him walk away from the profession. So why stop with this? Let's comprise all the "rules" for next year and make it to the NCAA, because winning is all that really counts, right?
OK, I just hope this doesn't embolden the famous Colvin entourage back in Chicago, led by his dad. And I bet you know what I mean.
What a bunch of crap!!! Keep digging...
I could just as easily call what you are spouting a bunch of crap. All most are doing is using GMac's very own words against him.
What was crap about what I said? You do not think that GMac compromised his integrity? He made a statement at the time of the suspension that it did not matter about winning or losing games. Well, apparently it does.
So why should ISU stop there? If winning is what really matters, then why not go all in and go for it?
Where is the line?
The fact that your questions have nothing to do with the situation...Carry on.
I appreciate the explanation and can see where you are coming from with that. I guess for me personally it isn't a huge hit on his integrity. We are talking about a guy who was suspended because of his attitude. This isn't a Pierre Pierce situation, or even a Brian Ferentz situation. It was strictly a situation where his actions to the team were detrimental. Not letting him play last night to me would have been much more detrimental than holding him out. The reason he was suspended was to prove a point, I think that point was proven. I can understand people don't agree with it. What I don't understand is how big of deal it has become.
compromised integrity? He lifted a team/coach imposed suspension because of a negative attitude directed at the coaches/team. This was a team issue and should be left at that, if the coaches and players accept the decision that is ALL that matters.
Right. Great response. Carry on yourself.
Okay...Explain to me how Colvin's situation has anything to do with the NCAA?