Random Thoughts 18: The Year of Fire

Status
Not open for further replies.

BoxsterCy

Moderator
Staff member
Sep 14, 2009
48,380
47,298
113
Minnesota
Bought a heirloom tomato at the grocery the other night. One of those orangish yellow ones. So good on my lunchtime sammich. Haven't had a "real" tomato in some time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NWICY

SaraV

Moderator
Staff member
Mar 13, 2012
8,741
9,630
113
Halloween candy - I'm sure it's been in the backroom since mid-July.

And I'd bet you a shiny nickel that a fair amount of stores have Christmas stuff in the back since end of July.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: wxman1

cycloner29

Well-Known Member
Dec 17, 2008
12,856
12,429
113
Ames
Watching Big Brother trying to figure out who wins the power of veto. Wife goes, “I know who wins.” I’m like “then why in the hell are we even watching this show then?”
 

BoxsterCy

Moderator
Staff member
Sep 14, 2009
48,380
47,298
113
Minnesota
Percent of land covered in trees. Iowa is 46th. I question Nevada at 16% with amount of desert they have.

View attachment 132989

I wonder how much of that it urban trees. I have my contribution of trees on my 1/4 acre. Not counting the neighbors big oak and honey locust that hang over my lot. You can still see my roof in satellite map view. Think I should do a tree inventory.

1724350342419.png
 
Last edited:

BoxsterCy

Moderator
Staff member
Sep 14, 2009
48,380
47,298
113
Minnesota
Tree Inventory below. No wonder I see the bigger lots in the suburbs as being sort of "bare".

1 - large ginko (she's a beauty, eh)
1 - large silver maple
1 - fair sized red maple
1 - tall and thin white spruce
1 - one tall and thin white pine
7 - white cedars forming a screen along the alley
1 - large and declining red bud
1 - yuge radiant crabapple
3 - 40' tall columnar white pine
2 - pagoda dogwood
 

qwerty

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 3, 2020
7,730
11,703
113
60
Muscatine, IA
I wonder how much of that it urban trees. I have my contribution of trees on my 1/4 acre. Not counting the neighbors big oak and honey locust that hang over my lot. You can still see my roof in satellite map view. Think I should do a tree inventory.

View attachment 132991

I don't know if they even include trees on private lands (single homes). I believe this is more in open forest/timber land, not single family residences. Probably counts parks, etc. though. I don't know. The map I copied didn't have those details.
 

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,724
63,785
113
Not exactly sure.
I would like to see the historical values of this.
It wouldn't change much. Remember, Iowa was underwater for a good period of time. Looking back to early 1800s, before Iowa was a state or settled much, we were just shy of 19%. That would move us from 46 to 43 today, not then but if we had that amount today.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: wxman1 and Turn2

VeloClone

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
48,466
39,271
113
Brooklyn Park, MN
It wouldn't change much. Remember, Iowa was underwater for a good period of time. Looking back to early 1800s, before Iowa was a state or settled much, we were just shy of 19%. That would move us from 46 to 43 today, not then but if we had that amount today.
Yes, remember that Iowa was a prairie state, not a woodland state. Maybe the highest percentage of prairie of any state in the union. I don't know if it is strictly the case, but I differentiate tall grass prairie from the short grass Great Plains.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: wxman1

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,724
63,785
113
Not exactly sure.
Yes, remember that Iowa is a prairie state, not a woodland state. Maybe the highest percentage of prairie of any state in the union. I don't know if it is strictly the case, but I differentiate tall grass prairie from the short grass Great Plains.
So…….size matters?
 

VeloClone

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
48,466
39,271
113
Brooklyn Park, MN
So…….size matters?
chandler-friends.gif
 

Turn2

Well-Known Member
May 12, 2011
22,656
27,052
113
Clusterfunkeny
It wouldn't change much. Remember, Iowa was underwater for a good period of time. Looking back to early 1800s, before Iowa was a state or settled much, we were just shy of 19%. That would move us from 46 to 43 today, not then but if we had that amount today.
In other words, Iowa has forever lost about 60% of our native timber, which didn't amount to much to begin with. About half that loss was from 1850-1900, the rest since.

1724357743199.png
 

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,724
63,785
113
Not exactly sure.
In other words, Iowa has forever lost about 60% of our native timber, which didn't amount to much to begin with. About half that loss was from 1850-1900, the rest since.

View attachment 133011
 
Status
Not open for further replies.