You know, I don't even care what you guys talk about in these meetings, but do you guys have pipes and monocles?
Tally ho!
![]()
Magis 8 ball says yes. They would tell you but you can't handle it.
You know, I don't even care what you guys talk about in these meetings, but do you guys have pipes and monocles?
Tally ho!
![]()
I'm in that generation of kids, and I'll tell you right now: cut it out. When people look back on the past, they tend look at it in a brighter light than what actually happened. I work multiple jobs to help pay to put myself through school, and the vast majority of people that I know in "this generation of kids" do the same thing. Now, if you mean people aren't as prone to letting themselves get run over by overbearing leaders/bosses/coaches, then maybe yes. Kids might expect a little bit more from their leaders now than in the past, but is that a bad thing? I would think that a lesson we've learned from our past, from things like corporal punishment in schools or not allowing kids to talk until they are spoken to, would be that some of these things needed to change. A lot of people making this argument claim that they want kids to be more independent, but then when players decide to transfer from Iowa State because they think they can do more for themselves somewhere else, that's not OK.
Life is short, and the chances to play basketball at a competitive level for these players are very limited. They have a short window to try and get better to prove themselves if they want to play professionally. Do I like our transfers? No. Do I like the reasons given for our transfers? No. But, do I think players have the right to transfer if they think it will improve their situation? Yes. You shouldn't have to suffer through something if it is preventable. Maybe they could have been more picky in choosing to come to ISU, yes. However, that doesn't change where they are now, and what that situation is, and you can't change the past. You can only live in the present.
I'm in that generation of kids, and I'll tell you right now: cut it out. When people look back on the past, they tend look at it in a brighter light than what actually happened. I work multiple jobs to help pay to put myself through school, and the vast majority of people that I know in "this generation of kids" do the same thing. Now, if you mean people aren't as prone to letting themselves get run over by overbearing leaders/bosses/coaches, then maybe yes. Kids might expect a little bit more from their leaders now than in the past, but is that a bad thing? I would think that a lesson we've learned from our past, from things like corporal punishment in schools or not allowing kids to talk until they are spoken to, would be that some of these things needed to change. A lot of people making this argument claim that they want kids to be more independent, but then when players decide to transfer from Iowa State because they think they can do more for themselves somewhere else, that's not OK.
Life is short, and the chances to play basketball at a competitive level for these players are very limited. They have a short window to try and get better to prove themselves if they want to play professionally. Do I like our transfers? No. Do I like the reasons given for our transfers? No. But, do I think players have the right to transfer if they think it will improve their situation? Yes. You shouldn't have to suffer through something if it is preventable. Maybe they could have been more picky in choosing to come to ISU, yes. However, that doesn't change where they are now, and what that situation is, and you can't change the past. You can only live in the present.
I'm in that generation of kids, and I'll tell you right now: cut it out. When people look back on the past, they tend look at it in a brighter light than what actually happened. I work multiple jobs to help pay to put myself through school, and the vast majority of people that I know in "this generation of kids" do the same thing. Now, if you mean people aren't as prone to letting themselves get run over by overbearing leaders/bosses/coaches, then maybe yes. Kids might expect a little bit more from their leaders now than in the past, but is that a bad thing? I would think that a lesson we've learned from our past, from things like corporal punishment in schools or not allowing kids to talk until they are spoken to, would be that some of these things needed to change. A lot of people making this argument claim that they want kids to be more independent, but then when players decide to transfer from Iowa State because they think they can do more for themselves somewhere else, that's not OK.
Life is short, and the chances to play basketball at a competitive level for these players are very limited. They have a short window to try and get better to prove themselves if they want to play professionally. Do I like our transfers? No. Do I like the reasons given for our transfers? No. But, do I think players have the right to transfer if they think it will improve their situation? Yes. You shouldn't have to suffer through something if it is preventable. Maybe they could have been more picky in choosing to come to ISU, yes. However, that doesn't change where they are now, and what that situation is, and you can't change the past. You can only live in the present.
No offense but these vague posts are what we get from kg but you don't seem to get upset when he does it. "Good news coming in a week or so", "The program is heading in the right direction just trust me" etc....
Just saying.....![]()
Sorry - I didn't start it JP did. Long live JP!!
DSM4CY, I totally agree. and I think crazygreg does too. we were both posting in jest in our previous posts. guess you had to be there to get the inside jokes. My bad.
I've been had. Just saw the one line and got kind of angry. Reading Jamie's "explanation" of the basketball situation ****** me off earlier too. Of everything he could have done, he tried to put down Fennelly for one bad year of transfers and tried to blame everything on my generation of kids. I like a lot of what he's done, but JP really, REALLY ****** me off.I think you just helped JP's case. :wink:
I'm not defending kg about his 'vague posts of good fortune coming'... but there are an equal number of 'vague inside posts of bad fortune coming".
such as people saying things like:
'Dendy's gone... trust me.'
'There will be 2 or 3 more people following Colvin's lead... Mark it down'
and
"It's not over yet..." in response to something bad that happened.
It goes both ways... only there's a lot more people on the "unhappy with McD side" that only his posts get called out... not often when I see you guys getting upset with the vague, inside source posts with no proof or facts that happen to be negative about ISU basketball.
Big difference. when people say Dendy's gone, trust me, they don't ever claim to have any inside info, they pretty much admit to speculating. Not true the other way around. I'm not as hard on KG as most, but clearly his "haters" don't like the way he says he has inside info, but really just speculates like everyone else.
My question - Who is more right most of the time? Kg and his " good fortunes" are coming - Or the others with their "bad fortunes" are coming?? hahahaha
Haha...That was good.
You guys should know SnowCraig did a nice little edit job on old Summits post.:biggrin:
I took out the last sentence, which said Summit enjoyed the social group more than the main board. I was trying to not out the social group, but since they pretty much did that themselves, I guess there is no harm.