Stanford Dual Preview

ISU_Cyclones

Well-Known Member
May 9, 2018
369
422
63
37
Im actually pretty pleased tonight despite the loss. 3/4 of our wins were ranked wins. Eutons loss was nothing to be ashamed of. Let it get away from him in the end but was right there and looks like a great option at 165. Grice, Redding, Kane are likely 3rd string guys who it’s hard to expect a ton out of at this point. Riggins maybe the only match I found truly disappointing. 174 going to be an issue, team may be better with euton/gaitan manning 165/174.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: MattforState

CyCloneRastlinG

Well-Known Member
Oct 15, 2017
3,978
5,143
113
Iowa
Im actually pretty pleased tonight despite the loss. 3/4 of our wins were ranked wins. Eutons loss was nothing to be ashamed of. Let it get away from him in the end but was right there and looks like a great option at 165. Grice, Redding, Kane are likely 3rd string guys who it’s hard to expect a ton out of at this point. Riggins maybe the only match I found truly disappointing. 174 going to be an issue, team may be better with euton/gaitan manning 165/174.
You could be right, but I’m willing to bet Riggins and Naak both get a lot better this year after adjusting back down to 174. They both just need mat time and they will get the wheels turning again on offense. I was happy with 149, 165, 184, 197 and hwt. Those guys got after it
 
  • Like
Reactions: matclone

CyCloneRastlinG

Well-Known Member
Oct 15, 2017
3,978
5,143
113
Iowa
I think this is probably more concerning than any match result tonight. I have been worried about the amount of weight we're cutting as a team.
Agreed chasing that team trophy for the second year in a row comes at the expense of 125-141, 165, 184, and 197 all coming down in weight. 6/10 weights are dealing with big time cuts not including riggins and naak who are both technically coming down in weight as well
 

CycloneVet

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2011
9,914
11,738
113
Cedar Falls
Thing is Carroll and Herrera are gonna be 2 tough heavyweights that are both freshmen. Obviously Herreras was a turd but he looked active and athletic
 

Cloned4Cy

Member
Aug 28, 2024
33
43
18
Has anyone explained the "why" behind this? I'm pretty annoyed by this but I'm willing to listen to a reasonable explaination.
Now they don’t pay parking lot staff for events that won’t run out of parking slots. Save $ is my guess
 

CloneinWDSM

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2013
16,766
11,457
113
What’s the HWT future? With Carroll and Herrera, that is pretty stout and don’t think Carroll can do more than 1 at 197
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CycloneVet

H82Lose

Well-Known Member
May 24, 2024
237
421
63
You might be right, I was lied to then...lol. I was told he got hurt Thursday night. He was absolutely having trouble cutting weight, so you might be right.
 

stuclone

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 5, 2013
4,399
13,948
113
Ames, IA
I actually think Riggins wrestled fine. That kid beat MJ last year and is an AA contender. Riggins needs to get better at scrambling and finishing though, just finish a shot in the 1st and it’s a different match.

Best part of the dual was 184-hwt. Bockman getting the major at the end was very encouraging and CC handled a top 15 kid. Get Frost, Swid, Paniro, and Gaitan in the lineup and we win the dual going away
 
Last edited:

Cyforce

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2009
17,226
13,064
113
Des Moines
I’m definitely a novice but what I saw all night was Stanford countering our shots all night and destroying us in the scramble. I understand we didn’t have our best but would like someone in the know to explain. Were those poor shots or just superior counter moves? It looked like Stanford had a game plan and executed it well. Was this out of character for them or something we didn’t prepare well enough for?
 
  • Like
Reactions: crablegs

stuclone

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 5, 2013
4,399
13,948
113
Ames, IA
I’m definitely a novice but what I saw all night was Stanford countering our shots all night and destroying us in the scramble. I understand we didn’t have our best but would like someone in the know to explain. Were those poor shots or just superior counter moves? It looked like Stanford had a game plan and executed it well. Was this out of character for them or something we didn’t prepare for?
Stanford countered our attacks very well and credit to them. I think it is expected with Grice (small 133), Naak (true freshman wrestling a really good funky wrestler), and Euton (Garvin AA last year). All 3 are backups out in a tough spot against quality guys. Biggest disappointment is Redding- absolutely cannot get pinned there as a senior even if the kid is a true freshman phenom. Also a bit disappointed in Riggins as he was in deep multiple times, but he will get better and keep improving. Match provided good experience for those younger guys on what to expect and what they need to train on moving forward
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron