*****The Super, Mega, Huge Big 12 Expansion Thread*****

Status
Not open for further replies.

ChrisMWilliams

Publisher
Staff member
Bookie
Apr 10, 2006
25,241
50,466
113
41
Bondurant, Iowa
www.CycloneFanatic.com
But the Big East has been a viable league with 8-teams since 2005 and they don't have a university in their conference that can match with Texas. I feel safer if ISU hitched their wagon to UT: Chris is right, UT can't go independent because they would have nowhere to put their other sports, and they can't go to another conference because they can't bring the LHN with them. A Big 12 conference with a worst case scenario of UT, ISU, Kansas, Kansas St and Baylor still has more brand recognition than the soon to be 9-team Big East. The goal out of all of this needs to be how many universities make up a viable conference while also maintaining AQ status. If any other universities leave, the Big 12 leftovers and Texas can extend invites to the candidates that they all want and can rebuild the conference.

Agreed. But that has been in the past. I think that the Big East realizes that to be relevant in the future, they need to bulk up. Hence the TCU move and all of the interest in these "leftover" Big 12 schools.
 

weR138

Well-Known Member
Feb 20, 2008
12,187
5,138
113
Not only this, but do they think they'll have an easier road to success in football? I just don't really see what they gain from the move.

A delusion that they step out of UT's shadow.

I don't think that aTm will take KU and Vandy's spot as the SEC whipping post but clearly the SEC is a tougher league. As has been posted; aTm hasn't consistently been a third place finisher to OU and UT, so I wouldn't expect them to come in and do that in the SEC. It's like the Hawk fans that think adding UNL is a good move and brag about Big 10 parity; that's great but if there's such parity that only means league title will be fewer and farther between for conference members.
 

longtimeclone

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2009
7,952
230
63
Up north
You're theory is dead on. That scenario would be great for Iowa State....In the short term.

The problem I have it with it is long term, I'm not sure how viable a 9-team league would be. Who knows?

People a lot smarter than me will figure that out.

Maybe after teams start to notice that Texas/OU have an easier path to the NC and one of these teams play in the NC game consistently, there might be some SEC teams that become jealous. With 9 teams the revenue sharing will only get better. We might only be 9, but I think overall we might have actually come out a head because we can be choosy who we let in as long as we don't go out and get a Rice or Houston.

I think people need to realize that we aren't going to be a big dog anymore and we have to face that fact. People bring up the mega-conferences as the wave of the future but I think being so big will be their ultimate demise. Money is nice, but winning is even more nice. I think the path to the championship becomes very difficult in a mega-conference and while it might be easier for Texas/OU to make the NC teams will start to take notice and realize the mess that has been created. The only thing that can keep this theory together is how and when the BCS changes its bowl tie-ins because they don't operate very quickly I think ISU will be just fine.
 

acgclone

Well-Known Member
Feb 21, 2007
12,037
3,769
113
Yes Aggie will make more money in football. With expansion the SEC will undoubtedly sign the largest football television contract in the nation.

Aggie is butthurt. They are tired of being viewed as Austin's little brother and they hope this will allow them to step out of that shadow/tagline.

I'm guessing based on what the 10-team Big 12 was able to do recently, a 13 or 14-team SEC willl get a new contract that is insane. You would have Texas, Florida, North Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, Louisiana, Alabama amongst others (possibly Virginia). That is a pretty big chunk of the population and 2nd to the Big 10. The people in these states are rabid football fans as well. Kind of like how the Big 10 saw more value in 1.7m Nebraskans than several million people from New Jersey, etc.
 

acgclone

Well-Known Member
Feb 21, 2007
12,037
3,769
113
Maybe after teams start to notice that Texas/OU have an easier path to the NC and one of these teams play in the NC game consistently, there might be some SEC teams that become jealous. With 9 teams the revenue sharing will only get better. We might only be 9, but I think overall we might have actually come out a head because we can be choosy who we let in as long as we don't go out and get a Rice or Houston.

I think people need to realize that we aren't going to be a big dog anymore and we have to face that fact. People bring up the mega-conferences as the wave of the future but I think being so big will be their ultimate demise. Money is nice, but winning is even more nice. I think the path to the championship becomes very difficult in a mega-conference and while it might be easier for Texas/OU to make the NC teams will start to take notice and realize the mess that has been created. The only thing that can keep this theory together is how and when the BCS changes its bowl tie-ins because they don't operate very quickly I think ISU will be just fine.

They could ultimately force Texas and OU into a mega-conference for that reason. If they truly want to break away from the NCAA, then OU/UT's national championships would be pretty meaningless anyway. Those two schools would want in on a 16 team playoff or whatever alternative is set up.

A 9-team conference may be viable for a few years, but within the next decade, it will have to either expand or will implode.
 

longtimeclone

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2009
7,952
230
63
Up north
They could ultimately force Texas and OU into a mega-conference for that reason. If they truly want to break away from the NCAA, then OU/UT's national championships would be pretty meaningless anyway. Those two schools would want in on a 16 team playoff or whatever alternative is set up.

A 9-team conference may be viable for a few years, but within the next decade, it will have to either expand or will implode.

Do you honestly think that football playoffs are that close? I would like to see them but I think years from ever seeing this happen.

OU might join a 16 team conference. Texas will never join one unless they get a better deal than they already have or they are forced into one. I don't see the first one happening and the second one, I don't think Texas will do anything it doesn't want to do. NCAA is like a step parent to Texas they will listen when they want otherwise they operate by Texas rules.

I think you are dead right about the next decade though, but I see that the mega-conferences start to lose schools to the smaller conferences ie our Big 12.
 

longtimeclone

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2009
7,952
230
63
Up north
Shouldn't we have a Giggles report or attack by now? You know, our old pal from KXNO?

You know he jus-cant-wait until ISU is in the MAC! :wub:

He is either waiting for better sources or it is too much for him to take right now. (Robot can't process information that quickly.
 

chuckd4735

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 29, 2006
29,621
12,059
113
42
Lee's Summit, MO
Shouldn't we have a Giggles report or attack by now? You know, our old pal from KXNO?

You know he jus-cant-wait until ISU is in the MAC! :wub:

Him and CW are currently going at it on Twitter right now...


Me_working_normal.jpg

ChrisMWilliams Chris Williams



A 9-team Big 12 would be wonderful for ISU. Drop A&M. Add another non-con. More money. But how viable is that solution long-term? #Cyclones

12 minutes ago http://twitter.com/#http://twitter.com/#http://twitter.com/#




safe_image.php_normal.jpg

sportstalkmatt Matt Perrault @



@ChrisMWilliams You know the answer to that. TX is going to go Independent or go somewhere else. 8-team Big 12 doesn't have enough eyeballs

10 minutes ago http://twitter.com/#http://twitter.com/#http://twitter.com/#




Me_working_normal.jpg

ChrisMWilliams Chris Williams @



@sportstalkmatt Texas will not go independent Matt. They've said repeatedly that they don't want to. Texas wants the Big 12 to live.

9 minutes ago http://twitter.com/#http://twitter.com/#http://twitter.com/#




safe_image.php_normal.jpg

sportstalkmatt Matt Perrault @



@ChrisMWilliams Chip's latest article says that TX would talk to ND about joining another conference with them. Plus, the ESPN deal talks it

7 minutes ago http://twitter.com/#http://twitter.com/#http://twitter.com/#




Me_working_normal.jpg

ChrisMWilliams Chris Williams @



@sportstalkmatt Correct. But any lawyer at ESPN worth a crap has to put that language in a multi-million $ contract. The ND thing is a conf.

6 minutes ago http://twitter.com/#http://twitter.com/#http://twitter.com/#




safe_image.php_normal.jpg

sportstalkmatt Matt Perrault @



@ChrisMWilliams Remember that Chip is was wrong about a lot of stuff last time too. No A&M creates a domino effect. OU would be next IMO

3 minutes ago http://twitter.com/#http://twitter.com/#http://twitter.com/#





in reply to ↑
@ChrisMWilliams Chris Williams


@sportstalkmatt Tramel claims that OU would never go to SEC. "Culture" stuff. OU's road to NT is much easier in current situation.
 

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
98,858
62,435
113
55
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
Him and CW are currently going at it on Twitter right now...


Me_working_normal.jpg

ChrisMWilliams Chris Williams



A 9-team Big 12 would be wonderful for ISU. Drop A&M. Add another non-con. More money. But how viable is that solution long-term? #Cyclones

12 minutes ago




safe_image.php_normal.jpg

sportstalkmatt Matt Perrault @



@ChrisMWilliams You know the answer to that. TX is going to go Independent or go somewhere else. 8-team Big 12 doesn't have enough eyeballs

10 minutes ago




Me_working_normal.jpg

ChrisMWilliams Chris Williams @



@sportstalkmatt Texas will not go independent Matt. They've said repeatedly that they don't want to. Texas wants the Big 12 to live.

9 minutes ago




safe_image.php_normal.jpg

sportstalkmatt Matt Perrault @



@ChrisMWilliams Chip's latest article says that TX would talk to ND about joining another conference with them. Plus, the ESPN deal talks it

7 minutes ago




Me_working_normal.jpg

ChrisMWilliams Chris Williams @



@sportstalkmatt Correct. But any lawyer at ESPN worth a crap has to put that language in a multi-million $ contract. The ND thing is a conf.

6 minutes ago




safe_image.php_normal.jpg

sportstalkmatt Matt Perrault @



@ChrisMWilliams Remember that Chip is was wrong about a lot of stuff last time too. No A&M creates a domino effect. OU would be next IMO

3 minutes ago





in reply to ↑
@ChrisMWilliams Chris Williams


@sportstalkmatt Tramel claims that OU would never go to SEC. "Culture" stuff. OU's road to NT is much easier in current situation.

My money is all in on CW in that battle of wits.
 

UNIGuy4Cy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 11, 2009
9,410
287
113
Texas is not going independent, Perrault is such a db. If they go anywhere but the Big 12 it will be the Pac 12.
 

Sloup

Well-Known Member
Nov 14, 2009
1,188
60
48
35
Ames, IA
The question isn't when super conferences will come into play, the question is when the TV contract bubble will burst and hurt universities all across this country.

Seriously, people were stoked for the rising values of homes until it came out that lots of people couldn't actually afford their house. How long until a sports network makes a contract it can't live up to?

It will probably end up being good for putting college athletics in line with the original intention of giving athletes a way to earn a quality education, but I'm more worried that this economic shock will explode way to close to the academic side of American universities.
 

rholtgraves

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2009
11,201
6,751
113
The independent Texas talk is just complete idiot talk. It doesn't make any sense for them to not be in a conference because they need a place for all their other sports besides football and I doubt a conference would let them do that without taking football. Plus with a conference they have scheduling worked out. Who are they going to get to play them if they go independent? Especially with teams moving to 9 game conference schedules they won't get the quality of opponents they want. Notre Dame has an established list of teams they have been playing for years and that is why it works out. If ND was in conference all along and tried to go independent they wouldn't be able to schedule Michigan, Michigan St. USC, Purdue, etc. every year.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron