What's this team missing?

What's missing?

  • Swagger

    Votes: 6 7.0%
  • 3 Point Shot

    Votes: 21 24.4%
  • Coaching/Fred

    Votes: 18 20.9%
  • Bleached Tips

    Votes: 2 2.3%
  • Hustle

    Votes: 26 30.2%
  • Closers

    Votes: 14 16.3%
  • Depth

    Votes: 43 50.0%
  • Derpth

    Votes: 11 12.8%
  • Cheap High Quality Jerseys

    Votes: 3 3.5%
  • Loud Fans (too quiet)

    Votes: 10 11.6%
  • Clone Cones

    Votes: 3 3.5%
  • Nothing, the best is yet to come

    Votes: 7 8.1%

  • Total voters
    86

Rural

Well-Known Member
Feb 3, 2010
43,088
36,333
113
We probably gave up 20 plus points because we failed to hustle. Period.
 

Clone_12

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 11, 2006
2,987
318
83
I can work on organic chemistry my entire life and not get any better at it. We really just need one solid defender that understands principles and has the athletic ability to guard another team's best player, but we don't have that and we never had that on this team and it's not coming so we might as well score.

I agree that we're never going to be a great defensive team with this group, but it doesn't mean they can't get better...and the fact of the matter is that they need to get better if they want to make any sort of run in March.

At the beginning of the year they were playing pretty darn good on the defensive end of the court. So it's not like they aren't capable. If you watch us against Colorado, Chattanooga, and Chicago State (our first 3 games) and compare it to what we've seen the last few games, it's shocking how much worse we've been. And it's not just because of losing Naz.
 

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,629
79,924
113
DSM
Those of you saying Fred are very suspect. That guy (who basically stopped recruiting 2 years ago, thus the lack of depth now), had more games like today's than any coach in the country the past several years with a Top 15 team. He got us to new heights, but is also partly to blame for the lack of depth and toughness we have right now. He groomed these guys to be finesse players and kept them soft, now we're showing why we aren't at the level of OU with better players.

However Fred's strength was the rapport and confidence he instilled in the players he did have and that gave his team's the ability to bounce back and lock games like these away. I'm not sure that the players are going to get that this season (not through any of Prohm's fault btw).
 

swarthmoreCY

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2008
16,374
736
83
Here nor there
Those of you saying Fred are very suspect. That guy (who basically stopped recruiting 2 years ago, thus the lack of depth now), had more games like today's than any coach in the country the past several years with a Top 15 team. He got us to new heights, but is also partly to blame for the lack of depth and toughness we have right now. He groomed these guys to be finesse players and kept them soft, now we're showing why we aren't at the level of OU with better players.
Better players?
 

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,629
79,924
113
DSM
I agree that we're never going to be a great defensive team with this group, but it doesn't mean they can't get better...and the fact of the matter is that they need to get better if they want to make any sort of run in March.

At the beginning of the year they were playing pretty darn good on the defensive end of the court. So it's not like they aren't capable. If you watch us against Colorado, Chattanooga, and Chicago State (our first 3 games) and compare it to what we've seen the last few games, it's shocking how much worse we've been. And it's not just because of losing Naz.

If you want to compare what our team can do against the likes of CU, Chattanooga, and Chicago vs. the likes of Iowa, OU, and Baylor then you're going to be chasing your tail for quite a while.
 

Clone_12

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 11, 2006
2,987
318
83
If you want to compare what our team can do against the likes of CU, Chattanooga, and Chicago vs. the likes of Iowa, OU, and Baylor then you're going to be chasing your tail for quite a while.

How did you cherry pick those teams? Just picking the best teams we've played?

I'm comparing it to Iowa, UNI, Arkansas-Pine Bluff, Coppin State, Texas Tech, and Baylor. Our defense is nowhere near the level it was at the beginning of the year.
 
Last edited:

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,629
79,924
113
DSM
How did you cherry pick those teams? Just picking the best teams we've played?

I'm comparing it to Iowa, UNI, Arkansas-Pine Bluff, Coppin State, Texas Tech, and Baylor. Our defense is nowhere near the level it was at the beginning of the year.

Those are our last 2 losses plus a game that we probably should have lost (Iowa), those aren't cherry-picked at all. We've lost to good teams, we've beaten the teams we're better than, which is usually the case in sports. The UNI game, I'll throw that out because at some point we'll probably win a game we "shouldn't" to balance it out.
 

Clone_12

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 11, 2006
2,987
318
83
Those are our losses plus a game that we probably should have lost (Iowa), those aren't cherry-picked at all. We've lost to good teams, we've beaten the teams we're better than, which is usually the case in sports.

...and our defense has gotten worse as the season has moved on...There's no denying our defense has gotten worse. Anybody that has watched us should be able to tell the difference.

At the beginning of the year it was solid...now we're not keeping opposing team's guards out of the paint, which leads to layups or open 3's. We're slow to rotate. And we are getting beaten down the court repeatedly for layups.
 
Last edited:

swarthmoreCY

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2008
16,374
736
83
Here nor there
...and our defense has gotten worse as the season has moved on...There's no denying our defense has gotten worse. Anybody that has watched us should be able to tell the difference.

At the beginning of the year it was solid...now we're not keeping opposing team's guards out of the paint, which leads to layups or open 3's. We're slow to rotate. And we are getting beaten down the court repeatedly for layups.
Which games against good teams did we play good defense? He can't cherry-pick from a null set.
 

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,629
79,924
113
DSM
...and our defense has gotten worse as the season has moved on...There's no denying our defense has gotten worse. Anybody that has watched us should be able to tell the difference.

At the beginning of the year it was solid...now we're not keeping opposing team's guards out of the paint, which leads to layups or open 3's. We're slow to rotate. And we are getting beaten down the court repeatedly for layups.

So what you're saying is that the talent level/abilities of the opponents have no bearing on defensive efficiency?
 

Clone_12

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 11, 2006
2,987
318
83
So what you're saying is that the talent level/abilities of the opponents have no bearing on defensive efficiency?

How in the world is that what you took out of my comments? We sucked on defense against Arkansas Pine Bluff and Coppin State too...it's not like we've only been playing bad defense against good teams, and at no point is that what I said.
 
Last edited:

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,629
79,924
113
DSM
How in the world is that what you took out of my comments? We sucked on defense against Arkansas Pine Bluff and Coppin State too...

What I gathered from your posts is that we should be able to defend at the same level against OU, Baylor, etc. as we did against Colorado, Chattanooga, and Chicago St. Correct me if I'm wrong.
 

Clone_12

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 11, 2006
2,987
318
83
What I gathered from your posts is that we should be able to defend at the same level against OU, Baylor, etc. as we did against Colorado, Chattanooga, and Chicago St. Correct me if I'm wrong.

We should be able to defend at a better level than we did against Baylor, but the results could still be different than they would against a lesser opponent. Is it that difficult to grasp?

I actually thought we defended alright against OU, aside from some lapses on help defense.
 
Last edited:

Cyclonesrule91

Well-Known Member
Apr 10, 2006
5,465
941
113
57
Waukee
You forgot something on your list......DEFENSE. Unless they learn what that word means and actually use it in games, we won't finish in the top half of the Big 12. I didn't read the whole thread so maybe it was already mentioned.

Pretty easy to come up with the game plan when playing us. Drive the lane and you'll either get an easy layup or get fouled and get us in foul trouble.
 
Last edited:

Dopey

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2009
3,263
2,120
113
That guy who followed Matt A.

That white dude from Michigan.
 

dirtyninety

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2012
8,179
4,394
113
Mostly accurate and valid points on aspects of this team that are missing.....much of it is absent personnel that just is not going to change and puts us a top 25 team....not the Final Four we all dream of. The two I will highlight:
I voted for three point shooting....we have had a couple games where we had some pleasant "clutch" three pointers (Iowa) that saved wins....but we are missing the "killer" threes Naz would hit....The shots when we are up by 5 with 7 minutes left and just kill the other team's morale, impose our will, and give the separation so our poor free throw shooting isn't exposed.
Second I will also mention defense , but the tough defense with wise use of fouls that a tough team knows. I know they preach "no fouls" but there is time to whack theyguy. These tough games should end with more of our guys with 4 fouls as they deny the bunnies and take this war seriously. Of course, then we get into the depth problem if some games are officiated where wer get a few key guys to 4 quick. To summarize, wiht 4 minutes left in game and only 2 fouls, I expect Jameel to stop looking surprised about getting whacked and defend tough with concern of fouling as a secondary
 

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,629
79,924
113
DSM
That guy who followed Matt A.

That white dude from Michigan.

He of the 3 pts and 1 TO per game for a worse team in a less competitive conference? I'll take the scholly that opened up and take my chances that we get more production out of that ship.
 

swarthmoreCY

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2008
16,374
736
83
Here nor there
He of the 3 pts and 1 TO per game for a worse team in a less competitive conference? I'll take the scholly that opened up and take my chances that we get more production out of that ship.
Yeah, the concern some had about his shoulder surgeries turned out to be valid. Had we a staff to go out and get someone else it could have ended up a blessing. Diallo's younger teammate is the one we really missed out on, but Fred and Co ****ed that up even prior to Matt leaving.
 

psyclone51

Active Member
Nov 6, 2011
837
562
43
What I gathered from your posts is that we should be able to defend at the same level against OU, Baylor, etc. as we did against Colorado, Chattanooga, and Chicago St. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Exactly. Thank you for saying this, so I didn't have to. Some posts here make you scratch your head!