If it's the first you've heard of it, you're way behind. Crooked deal with Test Iowa. Company he worked with bilked several other states the same way.
I don’t live in Iowa, so haven’t heard any of this. From the few articles I just read, Kutcher simply referred the governor to an out-of-state company to supply testing. The state then entered into a contract with the company, and it may have been illegal because the test results were reported first to the out-of-state companies before going to the Iowa Department of Public Health.
What is crooked about that? Did the company not supply tests like they said they were going to, or were they otherwise deficient in holding up their end of the contract? Maybe I am missing other pertinent facts, but I don’t understand how the above could be interpreted as crooked or bilking the state out of money.