KPI is from a guy named Kevin Pagua. KP is Ken Pomeroy, sometimes seen as POM.Dumb question, whats KPI then if not KP? I thought those were same thing but apparently not?
KPI is from a guy named Kevin Pagua. KP is Ken Pomeroy, sometimes seen as POM.Dumb question, whats KPI then if not KP? I thought those were same thing but apparently not?
You're always a one bid league unless you get another one. That's sort of circular logic.I wonder if some people don’t know what the MVC looks like today even compared to 5 years ago.
fran just needs 10 more years to get his guys son's inDamn near rivals the Fran turnaround at EIU...
They placed Auburn in Birmingham last year, which is like 100 miles, they would 100% them there as a 7/8/9.I would think the committee would have better judgement placing a 8/9 seed only 60 miles away from their campus
I partially disagree.I know this is not popular, but I think they’re all overreacting to the conference tournaments. The committee has routinely ignored the results of the tournaments and seeded based more heavily on the regular season. So ISU will probably be a 2 seed
Massive difference between a 3 seeding and a 7/10 seeding in regards to site location.
Is it possible? Yes. Likely, No?
Frankly would welcome the matchup. As much as I enjoyed Hoibergs teams at ISU, TJs current team is the type that would absolutely frustrate the living hell out of them and completely disrupt.
They placed Auburn in Birmingham last year, which is like 100 miles, they would 100% them there as a 7/8/9.
Maybe, but the best #2 seed is not gaurenteed to go west. They could put us in the midwest, especially if Purdue is the #3 team.We'll be in the west region as the worst #1 or best #2.
Yeah, there's no way they can ignore a game during the season (conference tournaments are the season, albeit, not the regular season) where a team beats the AP #1 ranked team by nearly 30 points at a neutral site.I would absolutely normally agree with you but yesterday was different and I think will really make it hard for the committee to find much difference between UNC and ISUs resume. I agree that in the end we will be a 2 seed still but I think we improved from 7-8 overall to 5-6 at the worst now.
I partially disagree.
I agree the committee ignores the results of the tournament.
I disagree about seeding more heavily on the regular season. They seed more heavily based on total body of work. If two teams are close in the regular season, then the results of the tournament absolutely could flip things.
That said, Iowa State and UNC are really close either way and I wouldn't be surprised if either one is the last 1 seed.
Nardnuts is firmly in the “conference tournaments don’t matter” group but what we did to Baylor and Houston HAS to matter. Likewise NC losing to a team that was playing their 5th game in 5 days HAS to matter. It’s a total body of work and those games count. If we get pushed to East as a 2 that would be criminal.Lunardi doesnt have them as the top2. The top 2 seed goes to the closest region. He must have ISU 6 or 7.
Nothing says disrespect like a 2 seed...I do not want us to get a one seed. I want this team to play angry.
And i would think the committee would have better judgement than thatThey placed Auburn in Birmingham last year, which is like 100 miles, they would 100% them there as a 7/8/9.
They definitely try to avoid it but at times their hands are also tied due to conference rematches etc. With that being said, Nebby isn’t getting Omaha.A 3 seed playing close to home can and does happen. But the committee does not reward lower seeds by playing in their closest venue
It’s certainly been hit and miss at times but we’ve also never seen what happened yesterday. I think they will matter.I know this is not popular, but I think they’re all overreacting to the conference tournaments. The committee has routinely ignored the results of the tournaments and seeded based more heavily on the regular season. So ISU will probably be a 2 seed
Nothing says disrespect like a 2 seed...