ESPN, Fox Open Discussions for Next Big 12 Deal

JM4CY

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 23, 2012
33,655
64,961
113
America
giphy.gif
 

cyman05

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 7, 2010
2,119
305
83
Even if we were (which is nowhere near certain), why would you exclude two major players from negotiations? That severely undermines our position and potential.
Current partners get an exclusive negotiating window. Can’t open “formal” discussions with others until later. The article references Feb ‘24.
 

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
61,906
56,546
113
Not exactly sure.
Current partners get an exclusive negotiating window. Can’t open “formal” discussions with others until later. The article references Feb ‘24.
The one he responded to was making a smartalek response about not using ESPN and Fox and going full streaming.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Cyclonepride

LLCoolCY

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 28, 2010
9,798
15,874
113
Minneapolis
This was the move Yormark was brought in to make, secure the B12 future as the P3 conference. I was expecting B12 to open the window and not wait, this is the time to talk to Fox/ESPN and get the number for additional schools to know who to offer. It also hurts the PAC10 potential deal since they no longer are the only rights on the market to "officially" negotiate.
The worst thing would have been to not open them now and see the PAC10 schools panic into signing a GOR leaving the B12 selling the current teams with out the option of adding additional late night windows out west. We'll see if we ultimately expand (likely) but having all the options to do is a better negotiation move.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Farnsworth

tman24

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 6, 2008
6,069
1,873
113
Even if we were (which is nowhere near certain), why would you exclude two major players from negotiations? That severely undermines our position and potential.
depends how long the next contract is for. streaming sports is still cutting edge for netflix/amazon. unless they really throw some money im fine with what we have now for another 5ish years, and then try again.
 

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
96,820
58,042
113
53
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
depends how long the next contract is for. streaming sports is still cutting edge for netflix/amazon. unless they really throw some money im fine with what we have now for another 5ish years, and then try again.
Right, but it would be colossally stupid to throw any major players out of the pool of people competing for your media rights.
 

CascadeClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2009
9,072
10,911
113
Yup.

My guess is that ESPN or Fox pushes to move some Pac 12 teams east and lets OUT go early.

ESPN wants OuT.
Fox wants ??? (2-4 Pac teams into the B1G??)
Big12 wants cash.

If ESPN is willing to pay "market" plus some extra to get OuT rights, and Fox is willing to pay "market" (per team) for the Big12 with 4 more Pac schools... that seems like the outline. Fox would also be in the position to know which schools they actually want in the B1G and thus which ones we would get in the Big12 too, so less guesswork there.
 

JohnnyFive

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2012
5,071
2,198
113
Every other tweet Ive read about this this morning has a mouthbreathing Hawk fan in the comments talking about how this isnt an advantage for the Big 12.

If one of you is also on CF and reading this, Id kindly like to ask you to please go have sex with yourself.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron