2 available schollys go to...

CYEATHAWK

Well-Known Member
Aug 26, 2007
7,440
5,832
113
Did Oriakhi play on UCONN's championship team last year? If so.......he would be a great get. Can never have enough "been there, done that" attitude and experience. With Lucious and his time at Michigan State....that would be great. Then..get the experience Lockett brings to replace SC....and we just reload. The young bucs would then greatly benefit from being exposed to this winning attitude and experience, thus EXPECTING to do it themselves when it's their turn.
 

longtimeclone

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2009
7,952
230
63
Up north
Our scoring will look so much different this year, because we'll actually have a PG to facilitate an offense and a fast break. I would predict we'll score far more points in transition compared with this year. Guys like Babb, Ejim, Booker, Clyburn and Percy (Lockett too) would benefit from this.

Overall, I see our defense being much better also. I think we'll run and press more, and I see more rotation as a result.

Completely agree and I would really like to see us press and run.

I feel that Fred has built a team for next year and he will only go after players that will either fit into that system or his future plan. I probably need to start reading more football threads because I am starting to get really excited for basketball season again.
 

cymaniac17

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2010
1,398
33
48
Parts Unknown
I do think you bring up a good point. Not sure I'd really want 7 seniors on the team next year or not.... unless of course we get to the final four or something. Obviously, if you lose two players that don't appear like they'll ever contribute much, and you pick up two players that will contribute, that has to be a positive, but all these one year transfers I think will come back to haunt you. If anything, get a transfer that has 2 or 3 years left, that would help dramatically IMO over a one year guy. I think a good rule of thumb would be that you don't bring in more transfers in any given year than you do freshmen. IMO, as long as you are bringing in more true freshmen each year than transfers, you should be ok. I just don't want to get to the point where we're bringing in 3 transfers and one freshmen or something like that. I don't think that's healthy long term for the program. I'm not opposed to giving Bubu one of them if we can't find anyone worth bringing in. I don't understand why there's all the hate for this kid? He has in fact deserved a scholarship, that is not even in question in my mind. But if he's willing to be a walk-on so Fred can get more help, that's just frosting on the cake. But Bubu is deserving of a scholarship, that's not even up for debate. Fred said something to the affect after the Kentucky game that our ability to defend Kentucky's guards down the stretch suffered dramatically when Bubu fouled out. Go back and check it.... that's what he said. He basically said he was our best defender out there that night. If you don't think that kid deserves a scholarship, you're crazy. But like I said, if Bubu's willing to forgoe the scholarship so Fred can bring in more depth to win more games, that's great.
And if you think top 20ish talent like Lockett and Oriakhi are willing to come on board but Fred is going to be magnanimous and give it to Bubu, you're crazy.

apparently u didnt read his post
 

peteypie

Well-Known Member
Jun 20, 2007
6,548
2,609
113
Completely agree and I would really like to see us press and run.

I feel that Fred has built a team for next year and he will only go after players that will either fit into that system or his future plan. I probably need to start reading more football threads because I am starting to get really excited for basketball season again.

Completely disagree. We may run and press next year, and if we get Lockett I think we will. However Fred has often said that he will not recruit players for a specific system. He will get the best players available and find a system that works for them. i.e. this year with Royce at point forward
 

cloneteach

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2009
2,143
481
83
How about this lineup:

PG- Lucious
SG- Lockett
SF- Babb
SF/PF- Clyburn
C- Gibson

Back ups would be Ejim and McGee getting the most minutes, followed by Booker, Bubu, and Niang. That's a damn good rotation.

Once again, every lineup that puts Melvin on the bench is erroneous. Melvin was the 7th leading rebounder in the Big XII last year and 5 of the 6 in front of him will not be returning meaning he is the 2nd leading rebounder that is returning in the conference.
 

Cincyclone

Well-Known Member
Feb 5, 2012
3,104
165
48
How about this lineup:pG- LuciousSG- LockettSF- BabbSF/PF- ClyburnC- GibsonBack ups would be Ejim and McGee getting the most minutes, followed by Booker, Bubu, and Niang. That's a damn good rotation.
Once again, every lineup that puts Melvin on the bench is erroneous. Melvin was the 7th leading rebounder in the Big XII last year and 5 of the 6 in front of him will not be returning meaning he is the 2nd leading rebounder that is returning in the conference.

Really the starting lineup doesn't matter. Look at how much McGee played this year. I think we'll have 7 (if Lockett comes) guys who will play 20+ minutes regardless of who starts or not.
 

scyclonekid

Well-Known Member
Feb 13, 2008
9,416
3,879
113
Ejim will start whoever thinks other wise, really? He is a big part of our offense and defense.
 

CycloneVet

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2011
9,923
11,767
113
Cedar Falls
But the winning may not continue at the point where you are depending every single year on finding a diamond in the rough transfer to come in to save you. I think you need to have some younger guys that you are developing at all times.
Yea I think transfers are a complete waste of time, they are trouble makers, thugs and the like, why would anyone want them, you could never mold a bunch of transfers into a winning team.
Signed,
2011-2012 Cyclone mens BBall team
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron