This analysis actually applies to the series in general. People act like one team or the other become giant killers for this game, when really, the better team almost always wins.
Since 1998 (the oldest Sagrin rankings I could find), if there is a legitimate seperation between the teams, the better team has won 8/10. In years when the season ended with both teams ranked within 10 points (push years), that drops to 2/4 for the higher ranked team. Thatmakes sense, especially when you consider the home team won 3/4 in those push years (interestingly enough, ISU won all 4 of those).
Really the only 2 times that the significantly better team lost the game were 2002 and 2007, both of which happened due to an improbable performance from one ISUs players. Shaggy had what I would imagine was his best game by far, and Seneca had his 2nd highest yardage output of the season, added to the fact he was in the middle of what would be a 6 game win streak. Coupled with the fact that Brad Banks practically carried the Cy-Hawk trophy to our sidelines, this one is what you have to call an "outlier."
All in all, it comes down to either being the better team, or having a heroic effort in the upset. Heroics don't happen all that often, and the safe bet is the better team.
ISU-31 Iowa-21