So where is the conference room in the Jacobsen Building that I'm supposed to go to?
Right next to the Monte Teo's girlfriend. Can't miss it.
So where is the conference room in the Jacobsen Building that I'm supposed to go to?
Right next to the Monte Teo's girlfriend. Can't miss it.
President Leath. You should email him.So to get CA disbanded you'd prolly have to go above them, who would that be?
So where is the conference room in the Jacobsen Building that I'm supposed to go to?
Great question, cuz I have no idea.
Here's an update from the meeting tonight. Most of the ideas that you guys posted were thrown out there, such as rewards for fans that get into the game more, more special games such as ones with costume and poster contests. Also suggested was more props to be given to students during the games.
I also learned a little history behind Cyclone Alley that I didn't know. It was originally created to get more students to the games. Student attendance was a significant problem after Larry U had a couple bad seasons. With that in mind that is why Cyclone Alley exists today.
CAC also wants to here suggestions if people have ideas to make the game day experience better. They specifically said that students shouldn't be afraid to go down in front and talk to them before games if they have ideas.
In saying all that I believe that a lack of student involvement at games isn't a CAC problem but rather a student problem. Student attendance hasn't been good this year as a general rule with plenty of open seats in the upper deck. In the end students will determine how good the atmosphere of Cyclone Alley is, not CAC.
What was the argument given as to how CAC increases student attendance?
I also learned a little history behind Cyclone Alley that I didn't know. It was originally created to get more students to the games. Student attendance was a significant problem after Larry U had a couple bad seasons. With that in mind that is why Cyclone Alley exists today.
100 bucks says they told you to say this.In saying all that I believe that a lack of student involvement at games isn't a CAC problem but rather a student problem. Student attendance hasn't been good this year as a general rule with plenty of open seats in the upper deck. In the end students will determine how good the atmosphere of Cyclone Alley is, not CAC.
100 bucks says they told you to say this.
The hope from what I understand is that contests, free stuff, etc. will increase student attendance. The creation of CAC also wasn't just students that wanted to create an organization. CAC was set up in part by the alumni association. The athletic department backs CAC to the best of my knowledge.
Most importantly the meeting was constructive. Ideas were thrown back and forth and I trust that CA will be better for it. In regards to CyFan61's question, it wasn't really brought up, as the conversation of the history of CA was a brief one. The meeting was less of an informative one and more of a question-answer on ways to improve CA. I'm with Luth4Cy in that it is more of a culture problem than a CA problem. Sure, both sides have room to improve, I think we can all agree with that. But I'm glad they put forth the effort of trying to hear from the general students point of view of ways that the student section can be improved.
Nope, not even close. I simply said what I believe.
I don't mean this as disrespect, but why do I get the feeling that both of you guys are actually on CAC?
And I feel that way because I think you two are the only 2 people not bashing CA...
ISU oversold student tickets and we only filled the student section twice (K-State and Baylor). This is definitely a student culture problem rather than a Cyclone Alley problem.