We all understand it perfectly, you look like an extreme @$$hat by continually explaining it. You look monumentally idiotic not realizing that the same officials tend to ref a lot of Big 12 games. Your act is beyond tired.
Kansas up 1 at haltime at Texas Tech
- Thread starter cyclonefan1983
- Start date
We all understand it perfectly, you look like an extreme @$$hat by continually explaining it. You look monumentally idiotic not realizing that the same officials tend to ref a lot of Big 12 games. Your act is beyond tired.
We would all appreciate it if you were done, but I doubt it. I've been around here less than twqo months and heard you cry about it 1000 times...
Oh good, the GRAMMAR police. The best kind of message board user. At least your mother will be proud that something came of your college degree.
So you think there is some big conspiracy by the refs to help KU. Even if that was true (and it isn't) how is that KU's fault?
You have to be a closet EMAW. No self-loathing jayhawk fan would try this hard. Well played purple kansas.
Funny how every single basketball fan and analyst said ISU got screwed last year against KU..except the KU fans. Your fanbase is the one that's embarrassing. You guys have your heads so far up your ***** that you don't even realize how often KU basketball gets the benefit down the stretch.
When there's a basket scored during the half time magic show or the frisbee dog show at an ISU vs Texas Tech game it'll be irrational. Until that point we have plenty of perfectly rational reasons to hate KU.
If the measure of intelligence is the tin foil hat wearing big 12 refs conspiracy logic, I'll gladly go sit with the group labeled dumb ***.
Perhaps I'm missing the logic and motive though. Could someone enlighten me as to how all these Big 12 refs are in on a conspiracy theory to give KU all the calls? I mean do they fill out some sort of form to receive payments from the Big 12 offices after they officiate a KU game? Or do they just all meet before the season and determine it's in their best interests that KU win another conference tourney and anything they can do to assure that happens is the best way to go.
Okay, clearly I overrated you. It has nothing to do with grammar, and everything to do with having a better rebuttal than a 10 year-old.
You need to defend the refs to a fan base that wasn't involved with the game tonight. That sounds like a you problem.
At least the KU player was right next to the guy that fouled. The Texas Tech player was on the other side of the flor easily 30 feet away. And he didn't even call it on the wrong guy; he was just too stupid to hold up the right number of fingers and the official scorer was too incompetent to see if it made any sense and the rest of the crew was too lazy to see if they got it right as well.
We can all agree that college baskletball refereeing stinks and is monumentally inconsistent. It's part of the game. I would love to think that the refs are even competent enough to figure out how to skew a game in one team's favor. But as I witnessed tonight, they aren't even competent enough to figure out how to hold three fingers up on their hand instead of two.
A conspiracy or motive is not requisite for skewed incompetence. No different than phantom anticipation calls- the refs do not need to have motive to call a BS foul.
The thread was about Tech possibly pulling off an upset because they were down 1 at half, not Kansas getting every crunch time call.
