When were they terrible under Stevens? Boston has only missed the playoffs once with Stevens, his very first year there.You know when the Celtics were terrible, people still thought Brad Stevens was brilliant.
When were they terrible under Stevens? Boston has only missed the playoffs once with Stevens, his very first year there.You know when the Celtics were terrible, people still thought Brad Stevens was brilliant.
There isn't a single reason why he shouldn't come back and visit. CSP obviously invited him back to speak at some point this season. It speaks well to CSP and how secure he is.....a few posters should follow his cue instead of hating CFH and calling him the worst coach in the NBA.
I think a simply review of some of the posts will show you that at least 10-15 regular posters on here hate him with a passion.
When were they terrible under Stevens? Boston has only missed the playoffs once with Stevens, his very first year there.
Hmmm. Amazing how that works.
Danny Ainge is certainly not considered an elite GM.
I remember that story. Still brings a smile to my face.Ejim and Hoiberg are the foundation of the resurgence. Niang doesn't matter nearly as much without Melvin setting the stage, and in Niang's accounts, setting Niang straight in practice following a nice headlock takedown of the freshman.
I don't really care that Holberg is going to be back, but I'm excited about Monte coming back!
But what I do want to point out is that hearing Prohm talk about it is pretty amazing. Steve gets compared to Holberg constantly and most of the time unfairly. (see the first comment in this thread---maybe Prohm can teach Fred how to play defense or hold players accountable) Every time Iowa State loses or doesn't win by enough, the Iowa State Men's Basketball Facebook page is filled comments about how everyone wants Fred back. I'm sure Prohm gets plenty of messages on twitter from idiots about Fred.
But yet, time and time again, Steve gives Fred credit for everything. If someone asks about a win Steve will jump in to give credit to Fred. There hasn't been much as far as blaming the previous coach for last year from Steve. Replacing a legend is never easy. There's a reason so many times they fail. I know that most people would get plenty sick of hearing about the person we replaced, no matter how good he was.
I know Fred will get a well deserved welcome tomorrow night, but what I hope is that Steve gets an even warmer welcome. Because he's the one that is here. He's the one that recruited Marial and Lindell and Tyrese and Talen. He's the one that has formed a pretty special bond with Monte. And he's the one that just had ANOTHER tope 25 road win![]()
We've got a special coach. I wish we'd realize that.
Do you think they could handle critiques after we win, too? I would guess some of them just can’t handle reading non-glowing posts at anytime. It must suck to be that miserable and sensitive in a good season, but it’s probably just PTSD from some dark Cyclone days of the 70’s and 80’s.
But apparently good enough not to go out and get Dwyane Wade and Rajon Rondo for a coach that wants fast-paced shooters.
There isn't a single reason why he shouldn't come back and visit. CSP obviously invited him back to speak at some point this season. It speaks well to CSP and how secure he is.....a few posters should follow his cue instead of hating CFH and calling him the worst coach in the NBA.
This board melts down over anticipated criticism even before the game, which imo is worse than comments perceived as nitpicking by some, (good points by others). There are a few posters with nefarious intent imo, or just nuts. Does anyone even respond to CyBobby or Atlanta?There are some posters that offer criticism after the games we win that make good points. Certain posters should be able to handle that criticism. And then there are posters who nitpick before, during, and after the game that ruin it for others. Reading the game thread it is clear some posters post every single thought that comes to their head.
There are some posters that offer criticism after the games we win that make good points. Certain posters should be able to handle that criticism. And then there are posters who nitpick before, during, and after the game that ruin it for others. Reading the game thread it is clear some posters post every single thought that comes to their head.
The front office of the Celtics is generally regard as doing a good job imo. I’m not sure the same is true about GarPax.But apparently good enough not to go out and get Dwyane Wade and Rajon Rondo for a coach that wants fast-paced shooters.
That’s fair enough, but I’m glad Hoiberg revived our program and left us in a good place. Prohm took that success and kept it going, even possibly taking it a step further this year. I’m happy the way it’s played out. If Hoiberg left us in the McDermott condition that would have upset me.Anecdotally, the newer fans don't value Fred like the old guard. He was my favorite player (and everyone else's at that time) growing up, and I'll always think of him first as "The Mayor" on those Orr/Floyd teams. I don't think anyone hates him, but some fans think of him as the coach that left ISU for the NBA.
Over/under on ESPN camera shots of Fred during the game? It's going to be obnoxious.
The front office of the Celtics is generally regard as doing a good job imo. I’m not sure the same is true about GarPax.