Hire Dawn Staley. Proven winner and won't even be as expensive as Prohm.
Becky Hammon, Pop's assistant down in San Antonio would be in the same vein. Smart enough to work for Pop I'm guessing she is smarter than most coaches.
Hire Dawn Staley. Proven winner and won't even be as expensive as Prohm.
Can we get Homan to come down from his farm for a couple hundred grand and make our posts not soft?
Musselman would be my pick.Go big or go home: Scott Drew, Eric Musselman or Fred.
The man recruits NBA talent but can’t keep them or make them productive here as a team. So Bye bye!Sadly there is truth here.
Good.He’d probably make our current bigs cry.
Larry E definitely got his teams to play hard. I would like some of that back.
Is that you Margret?Plus the reason XF signed with the Cyclones cause we were trending up and Frans boys were headed the other direction, Fran has some players now and XF can see the direction and would be gone in a heartbeat!!!!
Plus the reason XF signed with the Cyclones cause we were trending up and Frans boys were headed the other direction, Fran has some players now and XF can see the direction and would be gone in a heartbeat!!!!
He signed with us during our worst season in 10 years....
He’d probably make our current bigs cry.
He signed with us because we've got a much better track record of putting guys in the NBA.
I'm gonna guess that loss to Tech last year in Hilton fits in here.
They also got lit up by TCU two seasons ago.
For every high point under Prohm there's a Bizarro World low point or two.
Sorry for super late reply, catching up on this thread. I can't deny Steve has had some major downs and bad losses, but thats inevitable. People act like Fred had a perfect tenure that Prohm screwed up completely like Fred didn't lose to an awful Texas Tech team and then UAB in the tourney with his best team. I feel like we constantly qualify prohm's positives and hammer his negatives.
Sorry for super late reply, catching up on this thread. I can't deny Steve has had some major downs and bad losses, but thats inevitable. People act like Fred had a perfect tenure that Prohm screwed up completely like Fred didn't lose to an awful Texas Tech team and then UAB in the tourney with his best team. I feel like we constantly qualify prohm's positives and hammer his negatives.
I think there was a big difference in Fred’s lows. At least on the conference losses (Texas Tech) we still looked the part that we always did. We just couldn’t hit a shot. I have mentally blocked out that UAB loss but even then I think we looked better there even with all the chemistry problems that year. I also think there were significantly less and they were significantly less bad.Sorry for super late reply, catching up on this thread. I can't deny Steve has had some major downs and bad losses, but thats inevitable. People act like Fred had a perfect tenure that Prohm screwed up completely like Fred didn't lose to an awful Texas Tech team and then UAB in the tourney with his best team. I feel like we constantly qualify prohm's positives and hammer his negatives.
I think there was a big difference in Fred’s lows. At least on the conference losses (Texas Tech) we still looked the part that we always did. We just couldn’t hit a shot. I have mentally blocked out that UAB loss but even then I think we looked better there even with all the chemistry problems that year. I also think there were significantly less and they were significantly less bad.
Fred's lows being discussed here are amazing. He lost to texas tech, a big 12 team, and lost to UAB in the NCAA tournament. Thats is what is being discussed as his lows. Prohms lows are things like biggest upset in bpi history, and worst loss to iowa ever. Most losses in 40 years.I think there was a big difference in Fred’s lows. At least on the conference losses (Texas Tech) we still looked the part that we always did. We just couldn’t hit a shot. I have mentally blocked out that UAB loss but even then I think we looked better there even with all the chemistry problems that year. I also think there were significantly less and they were significantly less bad.