This is so true. I don't even think Nebraska fans are fully aware of this, but damn if it isn't true.
Yep. I think people confused their desire for the Big XII to collapse without them as just some blood feud with Texas. It goes far deeper then that. Texas came in and stole their thunder when the Big XII was formed and nothing would boost the Husker's ego more then leaving and watching the whole thing implode without them. It isn't about hating Texas. It has far more to do with Nebby's own feelings of superiority then anything else. Most Nebby fans you see are ****** with the progress and success the Big XII is already having without them which is why they are still so interested in everything Big XII related. They still have their fingers crossed that the Big XII will fall apart. Trust me.... 100 years from now if the Big XII disbands you can bet that there will be Husker fans cheering saying "Everyone always knew the Big XII would never survive without us!! Yee Haw!!!"
When it comes to anything related to UT, you can't have any rational discussion with an Ag. I just decided to smile and nod after giving up.
As for aTm leaving the Big 12, I don't think that's going to happen. Most of the regents down here want UT and aTm together forever.
I got banned from the A&M Scout board for calling them a bunch of loonies with their SEC aspirations.
i cant believe some of you are trying to justify this! wow.
i follow ISU as a second team considering i went to school there, so i hate to see this happen.
Al_4_state, you might as well just bend over and take it, because that is what you are doing without complaint.
essentially what is happening here is that UT is going to make more money off of other fans that have to buy the network to watch one game and that money could be spent on that fans own team! and tv is tv sure but not everywhere is going to have access to the longhorn network.
ISU fans are the ONLY fans in the big12 that seem to be ok with this happening other that UT of course. there is a reason that the other 8 teams arent too happy about it. i mean give me a break, i understand that ISU has not had historically great teams but that doesnt mean they need to just bend over.
To hear them talk, the SEC already made them a double-secret offer to join, so they're in whenever they want to get in.
I didn't used to think so negatively about Aggies, but being around them...sheesh!
Here's a simple solution - just turn on the TV, turn the volume down, turn the radio up... problem solved (if you don't mind a few second delay on audio).
Holy Crap, will you guys get over it? We took it from you guys for years as well. Voting against revenue sharing and anything else that came up that benefitted the top 4 in the Big XII. Then, when things didn't work out quite the way Nebby planned. They took their ball and ran away. Sorry, but ISU doesn't have that option. I never really cared much for Texas, but I have to admit, even though it padded their pockets quite a bit, at least they were the team that stuck around and decided to go with the Big XII. Call it bending over, call it smart financial direction, ISU would be in bad shape without Texas and I have no problem with Texas trying to take a bigger slice of the pie. They always did anyways, so if ISU can profit, then Texas can have what they need to keep the conference viable.
I have lost all respect, what littl there was for Nebraska and their fans. You have no right anymore to call foul, when you decided to bolt for a conference that stands for everything you voted against while you were in the Big XII. Face it, Nebraska is no different than Texas. They went where they could make the most money.
Give me one reason, just one, how this negatively affects ANYONE.
It's all about bitterness towards Texas that's rooted in jealousy. The difference between ISU and all these other schools is that ISU is far more in touch with the reality of the situation and doesn't see the point in whining about it. Without marquee schools, half of the schools in BCS leagues wouldn't be there. We benefit from Texas getting what they want.
HOW are we getting bent over? WHAT are we going to do about it?
Texas gets one freaking game on the LHN for one freaking year. It's just insane to me that fans from these other schools are so up in arms about "getting bent over". Who is Texas bending over? How are they doing it? I don't get it. People make a big deal over this for no reason. If anything kills the Big 12, it won't be Texas's greed but 8 other schools' irrational anger over Texas's greed.
first of all, i have no problem with texas. if it were any other team doing the same thing i would have the same opinion on it.
obviously as i said in my previous post this move takes money away from the institution that is forced (yes forced, they have no choice contrary to belief on this board) to play on the LHN. That institutions fans are forced (if they want to watch the game) to pay Texas to watch it, instead of being able to, for instance, donate money to ISU. I dont think you quite understand how business works exactly.
I would personally like to see ISU get better and better, as i mentioned previously, and i dont see how this is helping that cause.
And for anyone that just feels like attacking me because i am a husker fan, go ahead it just shows that you have no understanding of the situation and thus nothing to add so you take the easy way out.
Al_4_state, what i would like to know is: would you agree that as a fan of ISU would you be upset in the least bit if you couldnt see the ISU game because it was on the LHN? completely hypothetical, but a fair question because if you would be at all upset then i dont see how you can argue the way you are. just because you arent historically a great team doesnt mean that you dont have a voice. i know for a fact that other big 12 universities have voiced concern about this privately.
So one game in one season only that won't be an ISU game will be on HorNet and I'm supposed to be upset, got it.
Go find a Big Ten board, dip****.
I would personally like to see ISU get better and better, as i mentioned previously, and i dont see how this is helping that cause.
And for anyone that just feels like attacking me because i am a husker fan, go ahead it
I got banned from the A&M Scout board for calling them a bunch of loonies with their SEC aspirations.
Oh, the students want out. They definitely know what's best for the university. Much better than the AD's and presidents. Yep. I think Huskerfan has a seat open next to him in the NEBRASKSA/iowa state bus
obviously as i said in my previous post this move takes money away from the institution that is forced (yes forced, they have no choice contrary to belief on this board) to play on the LHN.
No, it doesn't. If Texas were to come to Ames and the game was broadcast on the LHN, then Texas foots the bill. For a "have-not" school like Iowa State, this allows the AD to look at moving finances to other projects, such as stadium renovations, new facilities, and newer equipment to compete with the other schools in the conference. In the past, it was put the game on local Mediacom and get the same quality of broadcasts that the high school games have. With the LHN, it would ensure an ESPN-caliber product with a stronger viewership than anything ISU could come up with at the current moment. If ISU or any other Big 12 university is "forced" to play on the TLN, then Texas will be "forced" to compensate them.
That institutions fans are forced (if they want to watch the game) to pay Texas to watch it, instead of being able to, for instance, donate money to ISU. I dont think you quite understand how business works exactly.
Wrong once again. ISU (or other Big 12 fans) will be "forced" into watching the Longhorn Network similar to how Nebraska fans will soon be "forced" to pay to have the Big 10 Network added to their cable providers.
I would personally like to see ISU get better and better, as i mentioned previously, and i dont see how this is helping that cause.
Because of initiatives like the TLN, universities like ISU are seeing increased revenues in their athletic budgets. These monies will ensure that the "have not" universities have the flexibility to make improvements and maintain a competitive product for the forseeable future.
first of all, i have no problem with texas. if it were any other team doing the same thing i would have the same opinion on it.
And for anyone that just feels like attacking me because i am a husker fan, go ahead it just shows that you have no understanding of the situation and thus nothing to add so you take the easy way out.