How about we quit building

cykadelic2

Well-Known Member
Jun 10, 2006
4,027
1,771
113
The problems are two-fold. First, commissioner Bob said there'd only be one game per year for each participating school. Both oSu and K-State will be in the second when the Cats visit. That's just absurd messaging or blatantly unethical, I'm not sure which. I've never found commissioner Bob to be the brightest light on the tree, so it shouldn't surprise me, I guess.
.
The one game per year referenced by Bowlsby was for football, not MBB.
 

IASTATE07

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 30, 2016
12,774
20,420
113
If you guys want to be at the same level as the MVC and other small conferences then ok. ESPN+ is where the MVC plays their games that are not on Fox Sports. B10, SEC, ACC all are on espn where most people can watch them with out needing to stream through their internet.

Rhoho is usually wrong so this makes me feel better.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CyDude16 and JP4CY

1UNI2ISU

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2013
9,050
12,161
113
Waterloo
If you guys want to be at the same level as the MVC and other small conferences then ok. ESPN+ is where the MVC plays their games that are not on Fox Sports. B10, SEC, ACC all are on espn where most people can watch them with out needing to stream through their internet.

Except there's a HUGE difference there. The MVC and other couple leagues that are using the platform are all producing the telecasts locally or even in house. (UNI sends its PSN games to ESPN+ for example).

With Big 12 Now, they are still ESPN productions. You won't notice a difference at all other than the buttons you click to get there. The SEC and ACC have games that are exclusive to their streaming services through the ESPN app as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CyDude16

JP4CY

Lord, beer me strength.
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 19, 2008
74,586
95,593
113
Testifying
Maybe we just geolocate and require a paywall if you are from or are currently in this location......

View attachment 66910
Dubuque isn't circled buddy boy?!!?!?!?
Gary-Dolphin.jpg
 

State43

Well-Known Member
Nov 22, 2010
17,201
3,519
113
Omaha, NE
ESPN+ is a direct result of streaming and lost revenue. Just another ploy for ESPN to get their money.
 

KnappShack

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2008
23,884
32,235
113
Parts Unknown
stuff and let us have free stuff. KU vs ISU basketball on ESPN plus is my last straw. I won’t be nearly as invested in college sports if they keep raising ticket prices and making us pay to watch the Clones. Not worth it. I’ll find other things to do. I know some will blast me but there is to
Much free stuff to do. I know it’s all about money now but
Man I miss the old days.


Plus ISU vs KU deserves big
Monday or at least on ESPN.

For years on this very internets ISU fans said we'll be in great shape when eyeballs don't matter. ISU fans will step up and pay for streaming because we are so energized....

And OP wants to give up. Did you also squawk when games moved to cable?

Pollard, be BOLD and build more "stuff"!
 

somecyguy

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2006
3,519
4,000
113
4 pages and not one person has mentioned that the REAL complaint is the second year in a row KU is scheduled to come to Ames during break.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: wclarson

iowastatefan1929

Well-Known Member
Oct 26, 2006
3,204
1,400
113
will iowa state benefit more on the new model or are we deluding ourselves? would be very interesting to see some actual numbers. is nielsen a dead company? samsung and the tv makers built a walled garden. can ads be inserted over the top of streaming?
 

wclarson

Well-Known Member
Oct 31, 2010
301
485
63
Ames, IA
The OP is probably mad that he cant scalp $5 tickets anymore like the gold ole days when we won 2 games a year in FB.
 

aeroclone

Well-Known Member
Oct 30, 2006
10,365
7,183
113
Sorry, but I'm also in the camp of this is a step backwards. When this was billed as a replacement to CyTV for 3rd tier stuff that was a big improvement. But losing conference games to this platform is not great for visibility and exposure. Most people are still cable subs, so they are going to have to add a service to watch all the games.

And you can dismiss the good old days talking about what the TV deal looked like in the 80s, but it had been much better recently. I've been living out of state for 12 years and have been able to see all of our conference games via ESPN networks that entire time. That has been a great arrangement.

This is not going to be mainstream anytime soon either. You aren't going to be able to walk into any old bar and restaurant and see an ESPN+ game, that is exposure lost for the league. They will just roll with whatever is on ESPN with their cable package.
 

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,648
79,979
113
DSM
Sorry, but I'm also in the camp of this is a step backwards. When this was billed as a replacement to CyTV for 3rd tier stuff that was a big improvement. But losing conference games to this platform is not great for visibility and exposure. Most people are still cable subs, so they are going to have to add a service to watch all the games.

And you can dismiss the good old days talking about what the TV deal looked like in the 80s, but it had been much better recently. I've been living out of state for 12 years and have been able to see all of our conference games via ESPN networks that entire time. That has been a great arrangement.

This is not going to be mainstream anytime soon either. You aren't going to be able to walk into any old bar and restaurant and see an ESPN+ game, that is exposure lost for the league. They will just roll with whatever is on ESPN with their cable package.

It’s part of the trend. ISU is an outlier in terms of season ticket sales and attendance. People don’t want to go to games and they don’t want to go to bars and watch games anymore. And that trend is just going to continue.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron