Playing Colvin - Mac's biggest mistake

JonDMiller

Well-Known Member
Jun 2, 2006
2,538
192
63
If all 3 (I think 4--right Jon?) of us are coming from similar churches, we should each know that none of us are better than anyone else. But any further and I probably send this to the cave.

I don't really know what you mean when u say church. I attend worship in a church but that church doesn't define me at all or my faith
 

khess83

Active Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 7, 2009
589
27
28
Waukee , IA
Dude, he said no such things on how anyone was morally inferior to him. You are cutting and splicing stuff

and Greg has judged himself here. When you say one thing and do another, there really isn't much to say


Steve's direct words: "I am not surprised that the guys at Cyclone Fanatic, whose moral standard is 'if she is old enough to be is old enough to for me' I am not so surprised that they are rallying around the flag. That is what I am referring to.
 

chuckd4735

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 29, 2006
29,626
12,066
113
42
Lee's Summit, MO
Steve's direct words: "I am not surprised that the guys at Cyclone Fanatic, whose moral standard is 'if she is old enough to be is old enough to for me' I am not so surprised that they are rallying around the flag. That is what I am referring to.

Yeah I just heard that as well. Maybe I am behind, but what does Deace have against this site?
 

Cyclonestate78

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2008
12,115
646
113
Morgan came in with a program that was in much better shape, and tore it apart. McDermott was left with Morgan's mess.

So after 4 years a good coach would have been able to turn things around just a little bit at the very least right?

I like Greg. He is a good guy. He had some terrible luck when he took over and pretty much every talented player we had bailed on him. That was a terrible break when he first took over and there is no doubt about that.

I love ISU Athletics and want to see them be successful in all sports. I supported McCarney when he took over the football program when it was absolutely awful and it took him several years before we really saw any success at all. I was ok with that because football is a much longer building process then it is for basketball. Do I think GMAC was given time to turn the program around? Yes. Unfortunately he just isn't getting the job done and in basketball after 4 years of time on the job our program hasn't really made any headway in getting better and winning games. It sucks quite frankly. I understand there is a huge price that we would pay to make a coaching change at the end of the season but at what point does the damage to the program out weigh the damage being done to it?

I just think that there are too many red flags being thrown out at this point from the program to avoid looking into this much deeper. Burying our heads in the sand and just sticking with the old company line is not going to solve the problems we are facing.

Another poster on here commented that all of the people who are upset about the state of the program and are venting their frustration need to go find a new team to cheer for? Really? Being a real ISU fan means we just sit on our hands, shut our mouths, donate money, buy tickets, buy Clone gear, etc.... and never ask any questions about what is going on with the programs that WE fund? So the answer is for fans that love ISU athletics to take their donations, purchases, attendance, and passion elsewhere? How awesome. I didn't realize that ISU Athletics were in such a great position that they can afford to lose about 50% of the fanbase.

Wake up people. Questioning things that are going on with the program is a part of being a fan. Having an opinion is part of being a fan. Speaking your mind is part of being a fan. Just be glad at the end of the day that apathy hasn't set in yet and people still actually care enough about ISU Men's Basketball to ***** about it. Just be glad that we aren't at the stage that Iowa Basketball has entered into. Also keep it in the back of your head that we aren't as far away from joining them as you would like to think.
 

Clonefan32

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2008
23,559
26,012
113
You weren't listening in late July of 2008 when ken and I were on the air together in kc. I've no problem with how I handle these things. Some of you can't possible imagine being able to comment on Iowa athletics objectively so you assume that an Iowa fan cannot possibly then comment on isu objectively. That's on you, not me

I said "I wonder if...", not an indictment, just making sure you were being consistent. I live in Iowa City and attend a few Iowa football games a year. I am completely able to comment on Iowa athletics objectively, and with your buddies "shock jock" type broadcast, I do wonder if you have the ability to comment objectively on Iowa State athletics. Thats on you, not me.
 

khess83

Active Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 7, 2009
589
27
28
Waukee , IA
So please tell me how Steve did not insult my morals given his statement above? Also the "Up yours comment"?

I am not attacking you Jon, I just don't like the way your show this morning portrays those of us who support the deciscion Coach McD made.
 

akclone

Well-Known Member
Bookie
Nov 28, 2006
1,192
223
63
515
Steve's direct words: "I am not surprised that the guys at Cyclone Fanatic, whose moral standard is 'if she is old enough to be is old enough to for me' I am not so surprised that they are rallying around the flag. That is what I am referring to.

I really don't know why anyone listens to any sports radio in DSM.
 

chuckd4735

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 29, 2006
29,626
12,066
113
42
Lee's Summit, MO
So after 4 years a good coach would have been able to turn things around just a little bit at the very least right?

I like Greg. He is a good guy. He had some terrible luck when he took over and pretty much every talented player we had bailed on him. That was a terrible break when he first took over and there is no doubt about that.

I love ISU Athletics and want to see them be successful in all sports. I supported McCarney when he took over the football program when it was absolutely awful and it took him several years before we really saw any success at all. I was ok with that because football is a much longer building process then it is for basketball. Do I think GMAC was given time to turn the program around? Yes. Unfortunately he just isn't getting the job done and in basketball after 4 years of time on the job our program hasn't really made any headway in getting better and winning games. It sucks quite frankly. I understand there is a huge price that we would pay to make a coaching change at the end of the season but at what point does the damage to the program out weigh the damage being done to it?

I just think that there are too many red flags being thrown out at this point from the program to avoid looking into this much deeper. Burying our heads in the sand and just sticking with the old company line is not going to solve the problems we are facing.

Another poster on here commented that all of the people who are upset about the state of the program and are venting their frustration need to go find a new team to cheer for? Really? Being a real ISU fan means we just sit on our hands, shut our mouths, donate money, buy tickets, buy Clone gear, etc.... and never ask any questions about what is going on with the programs that WE fund? So the answer is for fans that love ISU athletics to take their donations, purchases, attendance, and passion elsewhere? How awesome. I didn't realize that ISU Athletics were in such a great position that they can afford to lose about 50% of the fanbase.

Wake up people. Questioning things that are going on with the program is a part of being a fan. Having an opinion is part of being a fan. Speaking your mind is part of being a fan. Just be glad at the end of the day that apathy hasn't set in yet and people still actually care enough about ISU Men's Basketball to ***** about it. Just be glad that we aren't at the stage that Iowa Basketball has entered into. Also keep it in the back of your head that we aren't as far away from joining them as you would like to think.

100% agree with this.
 

Cloned4Life

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 5, 2006
3,620
3,390
113
Here's how things went down...Just going to say this once and leave it alone as it is very obvious we all have our own opinion.

Colvin made a mistake towards the team.

Mac talked to the team and they all said, punish him, but don't kick him off.

Mac suspends Colvin and talks to the press - we all know what he said...Mac needed to know if Colvin was serious about wanting to be part of the team.

Situation changes

Mac talks to the team and they all say, we need him.

Should we question the whole team's integrity? Should the team not be involved in a mistake made against them?

Jon Miller - please reply to this post above that I quoted...

Also, I caught a bit of the show this morning. One thing I just could not understand that Deace kept saying is "why not cheat in recruiting? Why not practice more than NCAA allows? why not pay players?" ...he kept referencing very illegal things. "If Mac is going to go against his principal here, why just do this and that too!?" He kept referencing cheating. He was referencing violations of College Basketball. NONE of those things is related to what Mac did. Mac suspended Colvin because of what he did to the team. Not an NCAA rule. The suspension had literally NOTHING to do with the NCAA or violations towards the NCAA. What Deace was referring to were blatant, dirty, violations of the NCAA rules.

Don't give me this crap that "rules are rules no matter what." There's a big, big, BIG difference between suspending a player for a bad attitude and blatantly cheating. What Greg did in this Colvin situation had NOTHING TO DO WITH CHEATING, so please tell that tubby buddy Steve of yours to get that through his head. It was so annoying, I had to turn the station.

If you don't agree with what Greg did, fine, that's your opinion. But do not equate it to cheating. If you want to go with the whole "doing what it takes to win at all costs" thing, fine, but again, stay away from the cheating part but Mac simply hasn't done it. And he hasn't lied to the media either the past 4 seasons, so why is it so hard to believe he truly felt he was playing Colvin so he wouldn't punish the other scholarship players? Is his reasoning THAT far fetched?
 

kg-cyclone

Well-Known Member
Oct 30, 2006
4,113
164
63
So please tell me how Steve did not insult my morals given his statement above? Also the "Up yours comment"?

I am not attacking you Jon, I just don't like the way your show this morning portrays those of us who support the deciscion Coach McD made.


I listened this morning...Jon and Deace blew this up into something bigger than it was. Plus they didn't have all the facts, but I found it entertaining.
 
  • Like
Reactions: khess83

Tre4ISU

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 30, 2008
28,211
9,323
113
Estherville
You weren't listening in late July of 2008 when ken and I were on the air together in kc. I've no problem with how I handle these things. Some of you can't possible imagine being able to comment on Iowa athletics objectively so you assume that an Iowa fan cannot possibly then comment on isu objectively. That's on you, not me

For one, they can't because most the time they don't really know all the facts. They see the main point and go from there. I suppose this is true for most teams but it really seems to be exaggerated by Iowa fans talking about the Clones. I, for one, don't really care about the Hawks unless we play them. I agree, a lot of Clone fans will bang on the Hawks any chance they get. Hawk fans do the same thing very often but since all we ever get in the news is a little blip, sometimes Hawks make up the rest of the story. Usually, when something happens with the Hawks the whole story is out there. Iowa fans or ISU fans cannot comment on the other one objectively. There is always going to be bias.
 

DaddyMac

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2006
14,070
453
83
Dear Lord...

He played a kid for about 7 minutes who was suspended by Mac's own hand, and he chose to reinstate him to help a team dessimated by injury and defection.

There are bigger tragedies in life.
 

RossHallHero

Active Member
Jul 8, 2009
905
45
28
So would rather have Mac go against the whole team. That sounds like a great idea.

It's not a democracy.

What's the point of having a coach? May as well just have a ballot box in the locker room and one on the bench.

Should we press? Yes or No?
Who should start?

If we might need a timeout, the players on the bench could huddle like they did on Family Feud.

Survey says, "Coward".
 

chuckd4735

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 29, 2006
29,626
12,066
113
42
Lee's Summit, MO
Dear Lord...

He played a kid for about 7 minutes who was suspended by Mac's own hand, and he chose to reinstate him to help a team dessimated by injury and defection.

There are bigger tragedies in life.

One would argue that we did not need his 7 minutes of contribution which lead to zero points, 2 fouls, and many poor shots.
 

Cloned4Life

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 5, 2006
3,620
3,390
113
Dear Lord...

He played a kid for about 7 minutes who was suspended by Mac's own hand, and he chose to reinstate him to help a team dessimated by injury and defection.

There are bigger tragedies in life.

And This.

But Steve Deace would have you believe that Mac is now up there with the worst of the worst cheaters and violators in college athletics.

Somehow, an internal team suspension is related to breaking the rules of a sport.
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,942
25,085
113
One would argue that we did not need his 7 minutes of contribution which lead to zero points, 2 fouls, and many poor shots.

By him being on the court one could argue that it gave Mac the opportunity to coach the other guards. Can't do much in game coaching if they never can sit down.