I don't have a dog in this fight; I just want the QB that will give ISU the best chance to win each game -- but this comment is just stupid. All accounts have Barnett as a very hard worker and great student of the game. What makes it a slam dunk that Jantz will improve and Barnett won't?
You have such a HO for Jantz and are so critical of Barnett that it is difficult to even read your posts anymore.
Because Barnett has been playing QB for years and is already pretty far along. You can't coach him up a whole lot more. Jantz its the opposite. He can be and needs coached up more. So while Barnett will likely play about the same next year(obviously he will improve a little), Jantz has the room to improve a lot.
My math might be a little off, but a QB who the coaches already trusted his arm more, he still managed to throw more TD's than INT's, and his completion percentage was better.. how does he not have the room to be a lot better next year?